Climate Accountability: Navigating California’s Climate Disclosure Laws

Sherwin Longasa
Sherwin Longasa

Manager, Technical Accounting

Climate Accountability: Navigating California’s Climate Disclosure Laws
As the world’s fourth-largest economy, California has taken proactive steps to combat climate change by mandating firms within its jurisdiction to report greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks starting in 2025.

On October 7, 2023, Governor Gavin Newsom signed a groundbreaking climate disclosure law package including three key acts:
  • California Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253)
  • Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261)
  • Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosures (AB 1305)

SB 253 and SB 261 are the first general regulations in the US requiring companies to report their greenhouse gas emissions and climate risks, while AB 1305 aims to prevent misleading claims about emissions, known as greenwashing. These laws mark a significant shift towards mandatory climate-related disclosure for companies operating in California.

Blog Graphics Graphs Charts 6
Blog Graphics Graphs Charts 7 1


AB 1305 applies to all public and private firms, irrespective of revenue. Moreover, the disclosure mandated by AB 1305 must be prominently displayed on the company’s website and updated at least annually. Failure to do so may result in civil penalties of up to $2,500 per day per violation, not exceeding $500,000.

While AB 1305 is set to take effect on January 1, 2024, Mr. Jesse Gabriel, the bill’s author, has clarified the timing of disclosures. In a letter addressed to the Chief Clerk of the Assembly, Mr. Gabriel indicated that while the bill does not explicitly outline the timeline for initial disclosures, he intends for the first annual disclosure to be published no later than January 1, 2025.

Looking for an Expert with Innovative Solutions for a Rapidly Changing ESG Landscape? Click here!


Blog Graphics Graphs Charts 8Sample

1. The term “doing business in California” is unclear in either bill. Further clarification regarding the definition of the term is expected in the future. However, it is defined by the State here.

2. Revenues are not required to be earned exclusively in California.

3. Note that a subsidiary is not required to prepare a separate climate-related financial risk report if consolidated reports are prepared. Furthermore, if a covered entity does not complete a report consistent with all required disclosures, the covered entity shall provide the recommended disclosures to the best of its ability, provide a detailed explanation for any reporting gaps, and describe steps the covered entity will take to prepare complete disclosures.

4. A nonprofit emissions reporting organization contracted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop a reporting program to receive and make publicly available disclosures that has experience with GHG emissions disclosure.


Following the Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards, companies must start working on identifying their GHG emissions sources, selecting an appropriate calculation approach, collecting data and determining emission factors, investing in calculation tools, and rolling up the data to corporate and reporting levels.

SB 261  requires disclosures following the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidelines, which requires the disclosures of the following key matters:
  • Governance - TCFD requires companies to describe their board’s oversight of climate-related risk and opportunities, including (a) the process and frequency the board is informed about climate-related issues, (b) whether climate-related issues are considered on board strategies and other business decisions, and (c) how the board monitors and oversees the process against goals and targets for addressing climate-related issues. Companies should also describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
  • Strategy - Disclosures should include information about a company’s climate-related risks and opportunities over the short, medium, and long term, describe its impact on the company’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning, and describe the resilience of the company’s strategy, considering different climate-related scenarios.
  • Risk management - Companies should disclose their processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks. This includes information on how the organization identifies and prioritizes climate-related risks, measures to mitigate them, and any associated financial implications.
  • Metrics and targets - TCFD requires companies to disclose specific metrics and targets related to climate-related risks and opportunities. This may include GHG emissions, energy consumption, water usage, and other relevant indicators. Companies should also disclose any targets they have set to address these issues and their progress towards achieving them.


Preparing for New Disclosures

All firms operating in California must start incorporating climate considerations into governance, risk management, and strategy. Establishing a cross-functional task force can ease the burden of organizing the company around the extensive impacts of the laws, which includes comprehensive data collection from both internal and external sources.

Key initial steps to take include:
  • Assessing and refining materiality determination: Once companies identify which law applies to them and review the required data, they need to shift their focus to relevant ESG topics, considering the needs of their internal and external stakeholders. Additionally, companies should evaluate their existing climate-specific or industry-specific disclosures, prepared under established standards and frameworks such as the GHG Protocol or TCFD, adapting them as necessary.
  • Identifying gaps: Companies must review the new regulatory requirements and timelines to determine the necessary changes and evaluate existing preparedness. This information facilitates coordinated data requirements with relevant internal stakeholders and process owners, including the board and C-suite leaders.
  • Evaluating processes, controls, and readiness: Entities can scrutinize their current internal control and data governance systems to assign roles and responsibilities for data ownership. Boards can develop oversight and top-down accountability mechanisms to support a controlled environment, enabling leaders to efficiently address climate, GHG disclosure, and control gaps. These measures can expedite ESG reporting within the Form 10-K filing timeline.
  • Investing in education, upskilling, and action: Providing training and other learning opportunities for the board and executive levels enhances the organizational capabilities necessary for assurance preparedness. Networking with relevant stakeholders, such as financial reporting and sustainability teams, can aid in drafting and finalizing disclosures related to climate and ESG emissions.


How Scrubbed Can Help

Given the comprehensive scope and timing considerations of the bills, planning for ESG regulation compliance now is a must. Establishing a multidisciplinary team comprising seasoned experts proficient in ESG accounting and regulatory nuances is necessary to help your company speed up aggregating, structuring, and formulating the required reporting protocols. 

Partnering with an outsourced accounting team like Scrubbed can give you access to to specialized ESG reporting services without the burden of hiring in-house. Reach out to Scrubbed today to harness the knowledge of our ESG professionals and streamline your organization’s compliance journey toward seamless adherence to regulatory mandates. 

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is general and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. It is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional services. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.
*Disclaimer: Services being offered do not require a state license.**Special thanks to Sharole Gay Hael for her valuable contribution to this article.

How Scrubbed can Help


Stay ahead of changing ESG regulations with confidence. Contact Scrubbed today to learn how our experienced professionals can help you prepare accurate climate disclosures, strengthen your reporting processes, and achieve compliance with California's new reporting requirements.

CONTACT US
How Scrubbed can Help

Related Content

Blogs

The ESG Translation Gap: Why Good Accounting Data Fails Sustainability Audits

The ESG Translation Gap: Why Good Accounting Data Fails Sustainability Audits

If I had to name the first common mistake I see growing companies make when they tackle ESG reporting, it is foundational: They don’t know if the data they are using is complete and accurate. More than that, they often don’t even know if it is the data they should be using. For years, ESG reporting was largely voluntary, a way to answer the public’s demand for accountability and show investors you were responsible. But as optional guidelines transition into emerging laws and requirements, the landscape shifts. Investors and regulators no longer want marketing campaigns. They want accurate data provided with assurance. This brings us to a harsh reality I share with teams newly subject to these regulations: If you are required to file a report in 2027 based on 2026 data, and you wait until 2026 to start preparing, you are already late. Leaders often assume their existing accounting systems are naturally ready to handle ESG reporting. They almost never are. The Illusion of Alignment I see leadership teams fall into this trap constantly. They look at their organizational chart, see a separate Finance team and a separate ESG team, and assume they are covered. But in practice, these two teams are working in silos, speaking entirely different languages. I see this pattern constantly with companies that have been publishing ESG reports voluntarily for a number of years. As they prepare for mandated regulatory reporting, leadership feels secure because their ESG team is getting the exact reports they requested from Finance. But the moment you dig into the architecture and bridge the two teams, the gaps become obvious. Here is how the breakdown usually happens: The Ask: The ESG team needs data to calculate emissions, so they ask Finance for certain reports. The Hand-off: Finance, wanting to be helpful, pulls the data and hands it over. The Gap: Finance teams are wired to be compliant with accounting standards, but they aren’t trained to understand ESG reporting. ESG teams are great at translating finance data into emissions, but they don’t have the concept of an audit. Because the ESG team didn’t have an audit background, they didn’t know how to establish completeness and accuracy. They didn’t know how to look for certain accounting transactions that would otherwise be considered emission or non-emissive (i.e., advance or duplicate payments, reversed entries in the vendor reports). They were running calculations on raw data. The people didn’t fail: the structure simply wasn’t built to translate between the two departments. The Reality of Retroactive Cleanup The true operational complexity of ESG reporting reveals itself when you try to force accounting data into sustainability buckets. Take something as standard as a growing portfolio of leased facilities. From a purely financial perspective, a company might have these perfectly recorded. But you cannot translate that 1:1 to ESG data. For ESG, you have to review the business structure to see who actually holds ‘operational control’ so you can assign those facilities to the proper emissions categories.. When a company’s data architecture isn’t set up for this level of granularity, teams are forced to go back and manually revisit hundreds of outstanding contracts. What should take a minute to encode upfront easily turns into a multi-month project just to find the proper data sources. When you wait to build the system, you force your teams to look backward instead of forward. What You Need to Check Today The fix is actively bridging the technical gap. You need professionals who can translate complex sustainability metrics into an accounting standard, and vice versa. If you are a CFO or sustainability leader reading this today, before making your next public ESG commitment, take a hard look at your architecture. Ask yourself these three questions: Are my on-book activities scoped properly? Check if all financial transactions have been mapped to the appropriate ESG requirement. Are my off-book activities accounted for? Ensure your people management, technology, and operational data are fully captured. Are all stakeholders involved? If ESG reporting is falling entirely on your Finance team, or solely on your ESG team without Finance’s oversight, you have a translation gap. Operations, HR, and Tech must understand the why and the how of the data they are providing. A calm, predictable reporting cycle is designed, never improvised. Build the data architecture a year or two before the regulations hit, and ensure your financial execution naturally supports confident sustainability reporting.

Read More >
Blogs

Sustainable Spaces: From Compliance to Commitment

Sustainable Spaces: From Compliance to Commitment

Climate change is a pressing issue, and the building and construction sector is a major contributor. A staggering 40% of energy-related CO2 emissions come from buildings, and, according to the UN Environment Programme’s 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction, the industry falls short of decarbonization targets, with CO2 emissions currently reaching new highs. From materials used to construction practices and daily operations, traditional methods take a toll on the environment. Sustainable building—architecture focusing on environmental responsibility—offers a solution. Looking for Innovative Solutions for a Rapidly Changing ESG Landscape? Click here! Building Green: A New Approach Sustainable design is about creating buildings that meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Its key principles include: Eco-friendly materials: Responsibly harvested wood, recycled steel, and locally sourced materials reduce embodied carbon and transportation emissions. Innovations like carbon-neutral concrete further reduce environmental impact. Energy-efficient glasses in façades minimize heat gain and reliance on cooling and lighting. Passive & active design strategies: Passive strategies utilize natural elements for energy efficiency and comfort. Daylighting, natural ventilation, and well-insulated walls and roofs improve energy efficiency and resource optimization. On the other hand, active design utilizes technologies like solar panels and wind turbines to generate electricity, working alongside passive strategies for a more sustainable future. Water conservation: Rainwater harvesting systems, low-flow fixtures, and efficient irrigation minimize freshwater demand and water wastage, preserving resources and cutting costs. Sustainable Leaders Around the Globe Many companies are embracing sustainable practices, showcasing the power of green building. Some prominent examples are: Apple Park (Cupertino, California): Features one of the largest on-site solar installations globally, alongside natural cooling systems and extensive green spaces. Googleplex (Mountain View, California): Utilizes solar power, recycled water for irrigation, and a building management system that monitors energy use. Pixel Building (Melbourne, Australia): Australia’s first carbon-neutral office building boasts efficient daylighting, wastewater processing, and a recycled aluminum façade. Bank of America Tower (New York City, New York): Uses 32% less energy than a typical office tower. Abundant daylighting, district-chilled water for cooling, and a green roof prioritize energy efficiency and resource conservation. The Edge (Amsterdam, Netherlands): Cutting-edge energy efficiency and occupant comfort technologies include a “digital ceiling” with sensors optimizing lighting and an aquifer-based temperature regulation system. Global Standards and Certifications Transitioning to sustainable spaces can unlock exciting opportunities, such as attracting investment from environmentally conscious businesses and consumers. Sustainable building practices are not just good for the planet but also good for business and several frameworks exist to guide the design and construction of sustainable spaces: LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design): A comprehensive framework for designing, constructing, and operating green buildings. It evaluates energy efficiency, water conservation, and indoor environmental quality. BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) : Evaluates energy, materials, ecology, and water usage, promoting sustainable material usage and energy-efficient systems. WELL Building Standard: Prioritizes air and water quality, user well-being, and environmental sustainability for healthier buildings. Living Building Challenge: The most rigorous standard for sustainability, it emphasizes regenerative design principles, reducing energy consumption, and promoting on-site water harvesting. By prioritizing sustainable design principles, utilizing innovative materials and technologies, and adhering to global green building standards, we can transform our physical environment into a responsible and regenerative force for a healthier planet. This transition not only benefits the environment but fosters economic growth in new and innovative ways.

Read More >
Blogs

Sustainability Beyond Profit: ESG Trends for Nonprofit Organizations

Sustainability Beyond Profit: ESG Trends for Nonprofit Organizations

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles have traditionally been associated with for-profit businesses. However, in recent years, there has been a growing recognition of ESG’s relevance for nonprofit organizations (NPOs) as well. Why ESG Matters for NPOs For NPOs, ESG can be a strategic opportunity. As businesses and investors become more ESG-focused, they will be more selective in choosing NPO partners. NPOs with strong governance frameworks and clearly defined ESG practices will be seen as more trustworthy and impactful. ESG reporting also plays a role in enhancing transparency and accountability for NPOs, which can align well with your mission and reputation. Since following reporting standards also allows NPOs to be held to the same expectations as other sectors, it can also be seen as a way to strengthen your legitimacy and credibility. Internally, ESG reporting can also help focus your NPO constructively on self-assessment, measuring your impact, and continuously improving your practices. ESG in Day-To-Day Operations Some NPOs are already integrating ESG considerations into their day-to-day operations. Here are some ways they are doing this: Aligning mission and action: By their nature, NPOs address social or environmental issues. Integrating ESG ensures your organization’s business practices directly support your goals. For example, an environmental NPO might adopt sustainable practices in its offices, like using recycled paper or energy-efficient appliances. Proactive risk management: Thinking through ESG metrics helps NPOs identify and mitigate potential risks. This includes reputational risks tied to environmental practices, social justice concerns, or even regulatory compliance. Strong ESG practices can make your NPO more resilient. Boosting efficiency: Sustainable operations can lead to cost savings. This could mean reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste, or implementing a recycling program. These practices not only benefit the environment but also free up resources that NPOs can then direct towards the core mission. Building trust with stakeholders: A strong ESG commitment can increase donor and grantor confidence in your organization. Being transparent about your ESG practices fosters trust and credibility, leading to more fundraising opportunities and greater community involvement. Strengthening governance: Clear policies, procedures, and reporting mechanisms around ESG enhance the smooth running of your organization and provide greater transparency and accountability. Demonstrating strong governance makes your organization more efficient and also improves stakeholder trust and public support for your mission. Ensuring long-term viability: By embracing ESG, NPOs become more adaptable and sustainable in the long run. Strong ESG practices can help position your organization to navigate future challenges and continue delivering on your mission. Navigating Guidance and Frameworks Several frameworks have been developed to guide ESG reporting. While these tend to be aimed at the for-profit sector, they can still be valuable resources for NPOs. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): GRI offers general sustainability reporting guidelines that NPOs can adapt. These guidelines cover strategy, organizational profile, material aspects, stakeholder engagement, and more. The GRI website also provides implementation guidance. GRI Sector Disclosure G4 for NGOs: This GRI guidance specifically addresses reporting for NPOs. It recommends focusing on disclosures most relevant to the NPO’s mission and activities. The guidance suggests that specific standard disclosures per category should only be reported if they have been identified as material, in addition to the general standard disclosures mentioned. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) : NPOs can use the TCFD framework to improve their reporting on climate-related risks and opportunities. TCFD offers a structured approach to assessing and communicating climate risks and opportunities. Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP): The CDP platform encourages organizations to disclose environmental impacts, risks, and opportunities. While often used by corporations, it is also a valuable tool for NPOs seeking to be more environmentally transparent. Industry-Specific Guidance As non-profit organizations (NPOs) operate across various sectors, each catering to different societal needs, specific disclosure requirements are necessary, differing from the standard disclosures for the for-profit industry. The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) delineates detailed requirements per sector, such as healthcare, education, home builders and more. For instance, in healthcare, additional disclosures focus on patient privacy, electronic health records, and quality of care, also necessitating qualitative descriptions of policies and practices for securing personal health data and quantitative data on data breaches and patient readmissions. Similarly, education sector disclosures cover the quality of education and gainful employment, mandating disclosure of graduation and job placement rates. Furthermore, the home-building sector demands disclosures on the community impacts of new developments, encompassing details such as the total number of controlled lots and delivered homes. These tailored requirements reflect the unique operational landscapes and stakeholder interests of NPOs in various sectors that are not typically seen in the same sectors in the for-profit industry. We would also suggest following other NPOs that have already begun integrating ESG reporting into their work. For example, the American Red Cross has published a comprehensive ESG report that aligns with GRI standards and sets a baseline for the Red Cross to measure future progress. Currently, NPOs are free to tailor the forms and content of reporting as long as they meet the minimum requirements of the standard they opt to use and disclose only credible and factual information. ESG is no longer just a concern for for-profit businesses; it is becoming increasingly important for NPOs. By embracing ESG principles, NPOs can enhance transparency, strengthen stakeholder confidence, improve operational efficiency, and position themselves for long-term success.

Read More >

Links

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.