Enhancing Transparency: Key Insights into ASU 2023-09 on Income Tax Disclosures

Alfonso Solomon Magno

Technical Accounting Services

Enhancing Transparency: Key Insights into ASU 2023-09 on Income Tax Disclosures

The global landscape of income tax has become increasingly complex, with multinational corporations facing a growing web of tax regulations across different jurisdictions. For investors, this complexity translates into a need for more transparency, making it difficult to assess a company’s tax risks and exposures. The need for more detailed income tax disclosures has become critical, prompting regulatory bodies to take action.



In response to these challenges, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-09 on December 14, 2023. This update aims to enhance the clarity and usefulness of income tax disclosures, ensuring that investors have the information necessary to make informed decisions. The key changes introduced include more rigorous requirements for effective tax rate reconciliation, disclosure of income taxes paid across various jurisdictions, replacing Public Entities with Public Business Entities (PBEs) throughout the ASU, and the removal of certain disclosure requirements.



Complying with these new disclosure requirements is essential to ensure transparent financial reporting and avoid potential penalties from regulatory bodies or auditors for inadequate or misleading disclosures. Adhering to ASU 2023-09 helps maintain compliance and minimizes the risk of legal or financial challenges due to insufficient disclosure.


What are the key changes to income tax disclosures?

The new income tax disclosure requirements affect the presentation and disclosure of a financial statement’s income tax information. These include changes in the effective rate reconciliation in the notes, accompanied by certain additional disclosure requirements, and an entity’s income taxes paid information


Effective Rate Reconciliation

Under ASU 2023-09, PBEs are now required to provide a more comprehensive reconciliation of the effective tax rate. This includes:


  1. Detailed Reconciliation: Entities must provide a tabular reconciliation of the effective tax rate, requiring the presentation of reconciling items in both amounts and percentages. Reconciling items must be separately presented and disclosed if they equal or exceed 5% of the product of pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations and the statutory tax rate.
  2. Categories of Reconciliation: The reconciliation must be broken down into specific categories, such as state and local income tax effects, foreign tax effects, tax credits, and changes in tax laws or rates. Each category must be detailed by nature and, in the case of foreign tax effects, by jurisdiction.

Comparison with Existing Disclosure:

  • Before ASU 2023-09: Previously, entities were required to disclose reconciling items either in amounts or percentages, with a general guideline to disclose items affecting the effective tax rate. The disclosure was less detailed, and there was no specific guidance on disaggregation thresholds or categories.
  • After ASU 2023-09: The new requirements mandate a more granular approach. For instance, entities must now:
    - Include a tabular presentation of reconciling items in both percentages and amounts.
    - Disclose reconciling items impacting the rate by 1.05% or more (assuming a statutory tax rate of 21%) with detailed categories and disaggregation.

 

Reconciling items means equal to or more than 5% of the amount computed by multiplying the pre-tax income by the statutory tax rate.


A tabular reconciliation must be between the following amounts and related rates for each annual reporting period.
Tabular reconciliation 2 1024x576

Illustrative Examples of Income Tax Reconciliation Disclosure:


Before ASU 2023-09:


Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations was $4,200 and $3,350 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. It differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 21% to pre-tax income from continuing operations as a result of the following:
Before ASU 2023 09 1 1024x576

The tabular presentation above shows a simplified reconciliation without detailed categories or thresholds for disaggregation.

After ASU 2023-09:


Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations was $4,200 and $3,350 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. It differed from the amounts computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 21% to pre-tax income from continuing operations as a result of the following:
After ASU 2023 09 1 768x1440

Disclosure Requirements

1. Required Categories:

The tabular rate reconciliation must include both percentages and amounts in the applicable reporting currency for the following categories:


A. State and local income tax, net of federal (national) income tax effect.

B. Foreign tax effects.

C. Effect of changes in tax laws or rates enacted during the period.

D. Effect of cross-border tax laws.

E. Tax credits.

F. Changes in valuation allowances.

G. Nontaxable or non-deductible items.

H. Changes in unrecognized tax benefits.


2. Disaggregation of Reconciling Items:

Reconciling items affecting the rate by 5% or more of the amount computed by multiplying pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations by the statutory rate must be disclosed separately.

 

A. Disaggregation by nature is required for items within categories such as cross-border tax laws, tax credits, or nontaxable/non-deductible items.

B. For foreign tax effects, disaggregation by jurisdiction (country) and by nature is required, except for changes in unrecognized tax benefits.

C. Disaggregation by nature is required for items not falling into the above categories.


3. Categorization Guidelines:


  • State and local income tax should reflect taxes imposed at the state or local level within the domicile jurisdiction.
  • Foreign tax effects should reflect taxes imposed by foreign jurisdictions.
  • Other categories should reflect federal (national) taxes imposed by the domicile jurisdiction.

 

4. Presentation of Reconciling Items:


  • Reconciling items must generally be presented on a gross basis. However, unrecognized tax benefits and certain cross-border tax law effects, including related tax credits, may be presented on a net basis.
  • Changes in unrecognized tax benefits may be disclosed on an aggregated basis across all jurisdictions.

 

Additional Requirements:


  • For the state and local category, a PBE must provide a qualitative description of the states and local jurisdictions that constitute the majority (greater than 50 percent) of the effect.
  • For Non-PBEs, a qualitative disclosure is required for specific categories of reconciling items and individual jurisdictions that lead to significant differences between the statutory and effective tax rates.


Removed Disclosures:


1. The nature and estimate of the range of reasonably possible increases or decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits balance in the next 12 months, or to make a statement that an estimate of the range cannot be made

  • Removal of this disclosure was based on feedback on the earlier exposure drafts that the amount is difficult to reliably predict and therefore may not provide meaningful information to investors.


2. The cumulative amount of each type of temporary difference when a deferred tax liability is not recognized because of the exceptions to comprehensive recognition of deferred taxes related to undistributed earnings of subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures.

  • Removal of this disclosure was based on feedback on the earlier exposure drafts that the disclosure is costly to prepare and significantly less relevant after considering the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


Income Taxes Paid

The ASU requires that all entities disclose on an annual basis the following information about income taxes paid:


1. The income taxes paid (net of refunds received) are disaggregated by federal (national), state, and foreign taxes.

2. The amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by individual jurisdictions in which income taxes paid (net of refunds received) is equal to or greater than 5% of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received).


The 5% threshold is evaluated using the absolute value of the net refund or net payment in each jurisdiction compared to the total income taxes paid (net of refunds received).


Who must comply with the New Income Tax Disclosures?​


The amendments introduced in ASU 2023-09 apply to all entities subject to income taxes, with some mandated disclosures applicable only to PBEs. ASU 2023-09 was made to follow the definition introduced in 2013-12 regarding Public Business Entities and Public Entity.


Public Business Entity

A public business entity is a business entity meeting any one of the criteria below. Neither a not-for-profit entity nor an employee benefit plan is a business entity.


A. It is required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to file or furnish financial statements, or does file or furnish financial statements (including voluntary filers), with the SEC (including other entities whose financial statements or financial information are required to be or are included in a filing).

B. It is required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act), as amended, or rules or regulations promulgated under the Act, to file or furnish financial statements with a regulatory agency other than the SEC.

C. It is required to file or furnish financial statements with a foreign or domestic regulatory agency in preparation for the sale of or for purposes of issuing securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer.

E. It has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market.

F. It has one or more securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer, and it is required by law, contract, or regulation to prepare U.S. GAAP financial statements (including footnotes) and make them publicly available on a periodic basis (for example, interim or annual periods). An entity must meet both of these conditions to meet this criterion.


An entity may meet the definition of a public business entity solely because its financial statements or financial information is included in another entity’s filing with the SEC. In that case, the entity is only a public business entity for purposes of financial statements that are filed or furnished with the SEC.


The following is a checklist on which disclosure applies to covered entities:

Checklist on which disclosure applies 1024x576

When Must Reporting Companies Start Complying with the New Income Tax Disclosures?

When Must Reporting Companies qydlpfmti2s3zcdqyili6oboezlor794mfb38q6iaw

Why is Compliance with ASU 2023-09 Essential?

ASU 2023-09 introduces key updates to income tax disclosures driven by the need for enhanced transparency and regulatory alignment. The detailed reconciliation of effective tax rates and disclosure of income taxes paid is crucial for investors to accurately assess tax risks and exposures. Compliance with these requirements aligns with updated regulatory standards and provides stakeholders with a clearer view of the company’s tax position. By adhering to ASU 2023-09, companies can avoid regulatory penalties, improve financial reporting quality, and support better comparability across entities.


How Scrubbed can help?

When navigating the complexities of income tax disclosures, having the right partner by your side can make all the difference. At Scrubbed, we understand the challenges of adapting to the dynamic world of accounting standards. Our team is committed to providing the specialized technical accounting support you need to succeed, particularly in collaboration with our dedicated tax team. Together, we ensure a seamless transition through the ASU 2023-09 updates, providing you with the support and resources needed to make informed, compliant decisions.



Beyond corporate disclosures, we also help organizations strengthen areas such as nonprofit financial reporting, ensuring transparency, compliance, and accountability across all reporting requirements.



Contact Scrubbed Today!

Our Technical Accounting Group is ready to assist you in providing transparent and up-to-date financial reports. We empower you to make strategic financial decisions and achieve your long-term goals. For a comprehensive consultancy assessment tailored to your specific needs, contact [email protected].

CONTACT US TODAY
Contact Scrubbed Today!

Related Content

Blogs

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

For growing pass-through entities, the September 15 tax deadline often creates a collision between cash flow and internal capacity. Guessing at estimated payments leaves companies vulnerable to IRS penalties or unnecessarily traps critical working capital meant for Q4 growth. By establishing a Safe Harbor floor and utilizing the Annualized Income Installment Method, companies can align tax outlays directly with actual revenue. When this execution is handled proactively, finance leaders stop playing defense against deadlines and reclaim their time for strategic planning. When a high-growth pass-through entity, such as an S-Corp or a Partnership, comes off an unexpectedly strong summer, revenue is up. This should be a moment for leadership to celebrate and plan their Q4 investments. Instead, the internal finance team often finds themselves staring down a cash crunch they didn't anticipate. The pressure point is September 15. For growing operations, this date is often a collision course. It is not only the deadline for Q3 estimated tax payments, but it is also the extended filing deadline for Forms 1065 and 1120-S . When you have an internal team trying to finalize the previous year's historical data while simultaneously projecting the current year's performance, the structure usually begins to strain. This isn't about a team dropping the ball. It's simply what happens when internal workflows haven't scaled up to match a company's growth. When two major deadlines collide, and the volume is too high, a stretched team has no choice but to improvise. The Cost of "Guesstimating" In a pass-through entity, the business itself generally does not pay federal income tax. Because income from partnerships and S corporations generally passes through to their owners, owners may need to make individual estimated tax payments based in part on their share of the entity’s taxable income When internal teams don't have a dedicated workflow for this, they often get bogged down trying to predict exact year-end profits during a busy quarter. Without a clear mechanism to manage this, I frequently see companies do one of two things: they either underpay and leave themselves vulnerable to IRS penalties, or they overpay to "be safe." Overpaying might feel like the responsible choice in the moment, but it unnecessarily ties up working capital. When these distributions are sized off gross revenue rather than a projection that accounts for deductions or state-level elections, the company pulls more cash out of the operating account than the owners actually owe. That excess traps liquidity that could have been used to fund critical Q4 growth initiatives—like a marketing push or inventory expansion—without seeking outside financing. Establishing an Estimated-Tax Safe Harbor  When our tax professionals step in to manage this process, the very first thing we do is establish a predictable foundation. We immediately build a "Tax Compliance Calendar" integrated with a "Safe Harbor Floor." A useful starting point is determining which estimated-tax safe harbor applies. For many taxpayers, one option is to base required annual payments on 100% of the prior year's tax, increasing to 110% for certain higher-income taxpayers. The current-year 90% test may also apply. Meeting the applicable requirements through timely payments can generally reduce exposure to estimated-tax underpayment penalties. Once that floor is established, we can adjust for the reality of the current year. Aligning Outlays with Actual Cash Flow If a company sees a massive spike in revenue during Q3, the standard installment method might demand a payment that creates a sudden cash flow imbalance. Good intentions won't balance the cash flow at this stage; you need a precise mathematical approach. To stabilize cash flow during a sudden revenue surge, one strategy to consider is the Annualized Income Installment Method . Instead of assuming income is earned evenly throughout the year, the Annualized Income Installment Method determines the owner's required installments based more closely on income earned during the applicable annualization periods State-level PTE tax elections may also provide federal tax benefits by allowing qualifying state income taxes to be paid and deducted at the entity level rather than being subject to the individual SALT deduction limitation. The result? Depending on the state's PTE tax regime, entity-level payments may reduce the state estimated-tax payments otherwise required from individual owners. A deductible PTE tax payment may also reduce the taxable income passed through to owners for federal purposes, which can affect their projected federal estimated-tax liability. Restoring Strategic Headspace When tax planning is handled consistently throughout the year, it changes how a leadership team operates. It can significantly reduce the risk of an "April Surprise." When Q3 estimates are calculated accurately and tied to a deliberate strategy, leadership knows exactly how much capital is truly theirs to spend. Tax shifts from a looming, unpredictable liability into a manageable line item. Just as importantly, the internal finance leader gets their time back. Instead of spending the first two weeks of September finalizing and issuing K-1s, calculating thresholds, and worrying about penalties, they can focus on high-level financial modeling and operational efficiency. A strong tax partner doesn't just run the numbers; they take the friction out of the process so your team can focus forward. When an experienced team handles the heavy lifting behind the scenes, you stop playing defense against IRS deadlines and start using tax strategy as a genuine tool to fund your growth. See how our tax professionals support growing operations and keep execution predictable. Let's talk through how we can support your finance function. Comparing Q3 Tax Strategies: Safe Harbor vs. Annualized Method vs. PTE Strategy Ideal for Primary Benefit Risk Level  100%/110% Safe Harbor  Rapidly growing companies  Provides protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied  Low (May temporarily tie up cash if revenue drops)  Annualized Method  Seasonal or late-year spiking revenue Align tax outlays directly with timing of taxable income  Moderate (Requires meticulous record-keeping) PTE Tax Election Entities in high-tax states May provide an entity-level federal deduction for qualifying state income taxes while providing state tax benefits to eligible owners Low (Requires state-specific eligibility and election compliance) Key Takeaways: The Deadline Collision: The simultaneous timing of Q3 estimates and extended historical filings places severe strain on internal finance teams when workflows haven't scaled. The Cost of "Guesstimating": Overpaying estimated taxes based on gross revenue ties up liquidity that could otherwise fund critical Q4 growth initiatives without requiring outside financing. Building a Safe Harbor Floor: Establishing a baseline payment based on 100% or 110% of the prior year's tax liability can provide protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when the applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied. Aligning Cash Flow: The Annualized Income Installment Method stabilizes cash positions by calculating tax based on income earned during the applicable annualization periods rather than an arbitrary quarterly fraction. Restoring Strategic Headspace: When tax planning is handled reliably behind the scenes, internal finance leaders get their time back to focus on high-level financial modeling instead of chasing K-1s.

Read More >
Blogs

Outsourced Accounting for Nonprofits: Choosing a Partner with the Right Expertise

Outsourced Accounting for Nonprofits: Choosing a Partner with the Right Expertise

Nonprofits have unique accounting needs. Meeting the financial requirements of donors, board members, regulators, and other stakeholders takes effective, precise accounting practices that demonstrate both fiscal integrity and compliance with governing tax laws. Like most organizations in the private sector, many nonprofits do not have the expertise or bandwidth in-house to manage the complexities of their accounting needs. Unlike for-profit firms, nonprofits are under heightened regulatory scrutiny to maintain their tax-exempt status, which means their accounting requirements can be much more extensive. Accordingly, an outsourced accounting model is a great option for many nonprofits. Selecting the right partner can be tricky, though, as not all accounting firms fully understand the breadth of financial pressures nonprofits face. So, what skills and expertise should nonprofits look for on an outsourced accounting partner – and what other attributes are essential to a successful relationship? Sector, Regulatory Experience The accounting firm you select should have deep experience working with nonprofit organizations and have experts on staff who are well versed in all governing tax laws. Ultimately, the partner you choose must be able to help your organization: Maintain transparency with stakeholders Ensure that funds are properly used to support the mission Meet all U.S. GAAP standards Stay compliant, check out our Nonprofit accounting page and see how Scrubbed can help your NPO. Reporting Expertise Financial reporting is key to helping your nonprofit maintain compliance and communicate well with stakeholders. To that end, your outsourced accounting partner must have the expertise and staffing capacity to help you both keep complete, up-to-date financial records and create the many reports donors, board members, regulators, and other stakeholders require. Perhaps the most important financial statement a nonprofit must produce is the Form 990, which is filed annually with the IRS and must be accessible to the public as well. This form is used to demonstrate that the nonprofit qualifies for tax-exempt status, that its funding is, in fact, directed toward its underlying mission, and that the organization is not in any way abusing its tax-exempt status. Board members, donors, the media, and members of the general public may request a nonprofit’s Form 990 as well to see how funds are used and assess the organization’s overall financial health. Other key reports your accounting firm must be experienced at creating include: Statement of Activities[LW1] Statement of Financial Position Cash Flow Statement Functional Expenses Statement Budget-to-actual reports are also recommended for nonprofits for both evaluating operating practices and future strategic planning. Beyond Reporting While reporting, planning, and regulatory compliance are critically important to your nonprofit’s success, the partner you select should also be there for the day-to-day financial tasks that keep your organization running smoothly, including: Building and managing your budget Tracking donor-restricted funding Managing government grants Filing invoices and reimbursements Providing comprehensive audit support As a nonprofit, though, your organization is about much more than money management. Nonprofits are expected to operate with the utmost integrity and transparency, which is why the reputation of the accounting firm you select is so critical. So, be sure to check references and confirm that you are working with a partner that shares your values and that brings to your organization the ethical standards that define your mission and that your donors and communities deserve.

Read More >
Blogs

Sustainability Beyond Profit: ESG Trends for Nonprofit Organizations

Sustainability Beyond Profit: ESG Trends for Nonprofit Organizations

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles have traditionally been associated with for-profit businesses. However, in recent years, there has been a growing recognition of ESG’s relevance for nonprofit organizations (NPOs) as well. Why ESG Matters for NPOs For NPOs, ESG can be a strategic opportunity. As businesses and investors become more ESG-focused, they will be more selective in choosing NPO partners. NPOs with strong governance frameworks and clearly defined ESG practices will be seen as more trustworthy and impactful. ESG reporting also plays a role in enhancing transparency and accountability for NPOs, which can align well with your mission and reputation. Since following reporting standards also allows NPOs to be held to the same expectations as other sectors, it can also be seen as a way to strengthen your legitimacy and credibility. Internally, ESG reporting can also help focus your NPO constructively on self-assessment, measuring your impact, and continuously improving your practices. ESG in Day-To-Day Operations Some NPOs are already integrating ESG considerations into their day-to-day operations. Here are some ways they are doing this: Aligning mission and action: By their nature, NPOs address social or environmental issues. Integrating ESG ensures your organization’s business practices directly support your goals. For example, an environmental NPO might adopt sustainable practices in its offices, like using recycled paper or energy-efficient appliances. Proactive risk management: Thinking through ESG metrics helps NPOs identify and mitigate potential risks. This includes reputational risks tied to environmental practices, social justice concerns, or even regulatory compliance. Strong ESG practices can make your NPO more resilient. Boosting efficiency: Sustainable operations can lead to cost savings. This could mean reducing energy consumption, minimizing waste, or implementing a recycling program. These practices not only benefit the environment but also free up resources that NPOs can then direct towards the core mission. Building trust with stakeholders: A strong ESG commitment can increase donor and grantor confidence in your organization. Being transparent about your ESG practices fosters trust and credibility, leading to more fundraising opportunities and greater community involvement. Strengthening governance: Clear policies, procedures, and reporting mechanisms around ESG enhance the smooth running of your organization and provide greater transparency and accountability. Demonstrating strong governance makes your organization more efficient and also improves stakeholder trust and public support for your mission. Ensuring long-term viability: By embracing ESG, NPOs become more adaptable and sustainable in the long run. Strong ESG practices can help position your organization to navigate future challenges and continue delivering on your mission. Navigating Guidance and Frameworks Several frameworks have been developed to guide ESG reporting. While these tend to be aimed at the for-profit sector, they can still be valuable resources for NPOs. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): GRI offers general sustainability reporting guidelines that NPOs can adapt. These guidelines cover strategy, organizational profile, material aspects, stakeholder engagement, and more. The GRI website also provides implementation guidance. GRI Sector Disclosure G4 for NGOs: This GRI guidance specifically addresses reporting for NPOs. It recommends focusing on disclosures most relevant to the NPO’s mission and activities. The guidance suggests that specific standard disclosures per category should only be reported if they have been identified as material, in addition to the general standard disclosures mentioned. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) : NPOs can use the TCFD framework to improve their reporting on climate-related risks and opportunities. TCFD offers a structured approach to assessing and communicating climate risks and opportunities. Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP): The CDP platform encourages organizations to disclose environmental impacts, risks, and opportunities. While often used by corporations, it is also a valuable tool for NPOs seeking to be more environmentally transparent. Industry-Specific Guidance As non-profit organizations (NPOs) operate across various sectors, each catering to different societal needs, specific disclosure requirements are necessary, differing from the standard disclosures for the for-profit industry. The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) delineates detailed requirements per sector, such as healthcare, education, home builders and more. For instance, in healthcare, additional disclosures focus on patient privacy, electronic health records, and quality of care, also necessitating qualitative descriptions of policies and practices for securing personal health data and quantitative data on data breaches and patient readmissions. Similarly, education sector disclosures cover the quality of education and gainful employment, mandating disclosure of graduation and job placement rates. Furthermore, the home-building sector demands disclosures on the community impacts of new developments, encompassing details such as the total number of controlled lots and delivered homes. These tailored requirements reflect the unique operational landscapes and stakeholder interests of NPOs in various sectors that are not typically seen in the same sectors in the for-profit industry. We would also suggest following other NPOs that have already begun integrating ESG reporting into their work. For example, the American Red Cross has published a comprehensive ESG report that aligns with GRI standards and sets a baseline for the Red Cross to measure future progress. Currently, NPOs are free to tailor the forms and content of reporting as long as they meet the minimum requirements of the standard they opt to use and disclose only credible and factual information. ESG is no longer just a concern for for-profit businesses; it is becoming increasingly important for NPOs. By embracing ESG principles, NPOs can enhance transparency, strengthen stakeholder confidence, improve operational efficiency, and position themselves for long-term success.

Read More >

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.