If Your Company is Involved in Leasing Activities, Have You Met the Requirements of ASC 842?

Scrubbed

Scrubbed

If Your Company is Involved in Leasing Activities, Have You Met the Requirements of ASC 842?
Businesses engaged in leasing activities have always found the related accounting requirements to be tricky. With a new accounting standard now mandatory for all private companies involved in leasing activities, things just got even more complex!
Thankfully, the Scrubbed accounting team has significant experience working with businesses involved in leasing activities and a deep understanding of the new accounting standard, called “ASC 842, Leases”. As part of our corporate finance advisory approach, our experts have compiled answers to the questions most likely on your mind about this new standard, so you can adopt it effectively and stay in compliance with the requirements.
Check out how Scrubbed can help your business on Tax Compliance & Advisory

What is ASC 842?

ASC 842 is a new standard for lease accounting issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). This standard requires businesses to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements, with a goal of improving financial transparency and ensuring consistency in financial reporting. The changes make it easier for users of financial statements to see a company’s exposure to risk, understand an organization’s true financial position, and make comparisons between organizations. 
Under the previous standard (ASC 840), many types of leases could be accounted for off the balance sheet. Since lease obligations can impact a company’s cash flows and its overall value, a more faithful representation of a business’s lease arrangements provides better transparency about its financial position. 
ASC 842 is the first major revamp to lease accounting since the release of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, now known as ASC 840, in 1977. Its core provision is to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for virtually all lease transactions, and it also creates new accounting considerations for how to reflect operating lease arrangements. These updates are especially relevant for businesses seeking real estate accounting solutions to ensure compliance and financial clarity.

When Does ASC 842 Go into Effect?

The standard went into effect as of 2022 for privately held companies; it was already in effect for most public companies.
If you run a private company and you operate on a calendar-year basis, you should adopt ASC 842 effective January 1, 2022 and follow ASC 842 in your year-end reporting as of December 31, 2022. 

What Will I Need to Do Differently Under ASC 842?

If your company has leasing activities, you’ll need to follow the ASC 842 standard to ensure you’re accounting for those leases properly and meeting the updated reporting requirements.
Specifically, you’ll need to:
  • Create an inventory of your lease contracts and review those contracts in detail.
  • Review recurring payments that might contain a lease.
  • Understand the size and complexity of your property lease portfolio.
  • Map out a strategy for implementing ASC 842, which involves understanding various adoption options and measures known as “policy expedients” that can facilitate a smooth transition. 
  • Accurately classify your leases as operating or finance leases based on ASC 842 definitions and update your chart of accounts accordingly.
  • Communicate with any creditors/lenders involved, in the event the standard impacts debt covenants.
  • Develop accurate financial statements that comply with the ASC 842 reporting requirements.
  • Discuss with stakeholders the impact of ASC 842 on financial reporting (e.g., the impact on relevant ratios).
  • Ensure anyone in your organization who’s involved with lease arrangements understands how the new standard will impact budgets and financial reports.
  • Decide whether specialized lease accounting software can help you comply with the new requirements. 

How Will ASC 842 Impact My Organization?

ASC 842 impacts both lessors and lessees, but not to the same degree.
For lessors, the changes represent more of a refinement than a complete remake when it comes to lease treatment. While the new standard doesn’t fundamentally change lessor accounting, there are some important differences compared to ASC 840, which still applies to lessors. For example, ASC 842 aligns lessor accounting guidance with the guidance in ASC 606 (revenue recognition), and it states that financial statements should now generally replace the word “rent” with “lease.”      
ASC 842 has a more significant impact on lessees. If you are a lessee, you’ll generally see higher right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on your balance sheet for two reasons: You’ll be capitalizing your operating lease arrangements (instead of recording them as an outright expense as you accounted for it under the old standard) and you’ll most likely be using the option of a risk-free rate in lieu of the incremental borrowing rate (IBR). 
While ASC 842 ideally requires using the rate implicit in the lease, with the IBR used in the absence of an implicit rate, as a private company you have the expedient option of using the risk-free rate by class of the underlying asset—meaning, you don’t have to apply this rate to every lease. Since the risk-free rate is usually lower than the IBR, it will result in higher right-of-use assets and lease liabilities and a higher net present value of future cash flows. You should also be aware that your debt-to-equity ratio is likely to increase due to the combined effects of using the risk-free rate and capitalization of your operating leases (assuming all other factors remain constant). 
ASC 842 will also impact your statement of cash flows presentation, since the amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets and lease payments are now presented separately under operating activities, using the indirect method of cash flows presentation. However, only the presentation will change; the actual cash flow remains the same.
Finally, implementing ASC 842 will require you to disclose significantly more information about your lease obligations than you have in the past—from the nature of all leases and subleases, to lease-related costs, and many other details. 
Keep in mind that the new standard applies to all active leases with an original contract of longer than 12 months, even if the remaining term is less than 12 months as of January 1, 2022. Leases with an original term of less than 12 months can still be capitalized if you don’t use the short-term lease expedient. In addition, leases with an original term of less than 12 months can still be scoped in the requirements of ASC 842, as the short-term lease expedient is only an option. 

Why is ASC 842 Challenging to Comply With?

This new standard requires a greater degree of judgment on the part of private companies when it comes to reporting on leases, along with much more extensive disclosure requirements than you were accustomed to under the previous standard. While it provides greater transparency about a business’s financial position it also makes lease accounting more complex, spurring more questions and the potential for confusion.

Why Did the Industry Change the Lease Accounting Standard?

Much of the impetus for ASC 842 stems from past financial scandals like the Enron case. Under the previous standard, a company with significant leases (like Enron) could publish financial statements that complied with the standard but didn’t provide a true picture of the business’s financial position or its degree of risk. For example, only leases that met certain financial thresholds were required to be included on the balance sheet. The update aimed to close those gaps and improve transparency especially in areas tied to risk and SOX compliance ensuring that lease obligations are clearly reflected in a company’s financial disclosures.
After Enron dissolved, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) tasked the FASB to develop better standards for disclosing lease arrangements. The resulting standard, ASC 842, requires public and private companies (excluding government entities) and certain nonprofit organizations to include much more detailed information about lease obligations in their financial statements. 

What Should I Do Next?

Complying with ASC 842 is an important but complicated undertaking. To ensure you meet all the new requirements correctly and as efficiently as possible, it’s best to turn to the outsourced accounting experts at Scrubbed.
The Scrubbed team has extensive experience with lease accounting and deep knowledge of ASC 842. We can help you make a streamlined transition to the new standard and avoid tying up your in-house team’s time and energy trying to understand all the technicalities and complexities.
Contact Scrubbed to learn more about ASC 842 and how you can get started on a smooth transition to this new standard. 

Related Content

Blogs

Tax, Insurance and Cash Flow: Finance Lessons for Multi-Property Real Estate Portfolios

Tax, Insurance and Cash Flow: Finance Lessons for Multi-Property Real Estate Portfolios

The Real Estate Spotlight was one of three industry spotlights at The Future Is Fractional 2026, hosted by Scrubbed on September 24, 2026. Scrubbed partner Ejie De Jesus moderated a conversation with Geraldine Serrano, Director at Specialty Tax Group; Alex Gilmete, commercial property and casualty advisor at USI Insurance Services; and Blake Peters, founder and principal of Peters Specialty Tax Services. They covered cost segregation and bonus depreciation, R&D tax credits for real estate, insurance availability and replacement costs, and shared and layered coverage for portfolios. The short version: bring tax and insurance specialists in before decisions are made, check that your coverage reflects today’s replacement costs, and look beyond a general CPA for specialized incentives. Real estate finance is rarely one entity with one set of books. It’s multiple properties, multiple entities and often multiple jurisdictions, in a tax and risk landscape that keeps shifting. At The Future Is Fractional 2026, a virtual conference hosted by finance and accounting advisory firm Scrubbed on September 24, 2026, Session 4 split into three industry breakouts running at the same time: real estate, nonprofit and technology. In the real estate track, Scrubbed partner Ejie De Jesus brought together three specialists in cost segregation, tax incentives and commercial insurance to talk about the strategies owners most often miss. Key Takeaways: Timing is the biggest gap. Tax incentives and cost segregation are often considered after key decisions are made, when the options have already narrowed. Cost segregation accelerates depreciation. Splitting a building into shorter-lived components lets owners take larger deductions sooner, and 100% bonus depreciation, restored by 2025 tax law, can pull those deductions into year one. R&D credits reach further than most owners think. Engineering, structural and energy design work on a property may qualify. Insurance has changed fast. Some properties can’t get standard A-rated coverage, and replacement costs may have outrun policy limits. Portfolios can share coverage. A shared primary layer with excess layers on top can cost less than insuring every property to full value. Bring in specialists early, keep the decisions. Specialist advisors fill in the picture; the owner makes the call. Meet the Panel Ejie De Jesus (moderator): Partner, Scrubbed. Geraldine Serrano: Director, Specialty Tax Group, known as the “Cost Seg Queen,” specializing in cost segregation and tax strategy for real estate investors.  Alex Gilmete : Commercial Property and Casualty Advisor, USI Insurance Services, helping businesses manage and transfer risk.  Blake Peters : Founder and Principal, Peters Specialty Tax Services, specializing in R&D tax credits and other incentive programs. Timing and Visibility Gaps in Portfolio Finance Awareness comes too late. Blake Peters said the largest gap he sees is awareness. Incentives such as investment tax credits, R&D credits and energy efficiency deductions are buried in the tax code, and when owners do know about them, they’re often “looked at a little too late in the process.” Evaluating them at the start of a project can improve returns, help finance it and give investors clearer visibility. Risk has shifted fast.  Alex Gilmete said insurance has changed dramatically in just a few years. Supply chain issues, tariffs and, in California, wildfire risk have reshaped how carriers, lenders and investors view a property, and how much liability an owner carries. Property risk and insurance volatility Standard carriers, non-admitted carriers and the FAIR Plan Some properties can no longer be insured by standard A-rated carriers, Gilmete said. Location, fire exposure and crime all affect what carriers will take on. Coverage Route What The Panel Described   Standard A-rated carriers Increasingly selective; may decline older or un-upgraded buildings   Non-admitted carriers An option when standard carriers decline, at higher cost   California FAIR Plan A fallback in California when other options aren’t available That’s why Gilmete talks with investors while they’re still comparing properties. What a carrier thinks of a location affects rates and coinsurance terms (the clause that penalizes owners who insure for less than full value). He said many investors are looking at Nevada as an alternative to California, while Texas carries its own fire and flood challenges. Are you really fully insured? Gilmete warned that long-time investors may not realize how tariffs and supply chain costs have raised replacement values. A building insured for $10 million might now cost $14 million to $15 million to rebuild after a total loss, leaving the owner to cover the gap. Shared and layered coverage for portfolios Rising premiums reduce net operating income, and lower NOI lowers property value. For portfolios, Gilmete described a shared and layered approach. Take 10 properties worth $10 million each. The owner may not need $100 million of primary coverage, since a total loss on every property in one policy period is unlikely unless they share a fire or flood zone. Instead, a shared primary layer, perhaps $30 million, covers all 10, with excess layers stacked on top from different carriers. Each higher layer is less likely to be used, so it costs less per dollar of coverage. Insurance review checklist, drawn from the panel Does the policy limit reflect today’s replacement cost, not the original value? How old are the roof, HVAC, plumbing and electrical systems, and what fire suppression and egress are in place? Is everything disclosed to the carrier accurate? Carriers may inspect, and can cancel if it isn’t. How do the location’s fire, flood and crime exposure affect which carriers will quote? For a portfolio, would a shared and layered structure fit your risk tolerance? Cost Segregation: Accelerating Depreciation for Cash Flow What is cost segregation? Cost segregation is a tax strategy that separates a building’s components into shorter depreciation periods. Instead of depreciating the whole property over 27.5 years (residential rental) or 39 years (commercial), owners can deduct shorter-lived components faster, lowering current tax liability and increasing cash flow. The Lego analogy Serrano’s explanation: picture a house built of Legos. The IRS treats a residential rental as wearing out over 27.5 years. But not every piece lasts that long. Carpet, floor coverings, cabinets and countertops are five-year pieces. Driveways and landscaping are 15-year pieces. A cost segregation study takes the house apart and sorts the shorter-lived pieces into their own buckets. Bonus depreciation under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed in July 2025, restored 100% bonus depreciation and made it permanent for qualifying property acquired after January 19, 2025. Combined with cost segregation, that lets owners deduct the full cost of those shorter-lived components in the first year. Serrano told the story of a client she called “Mr. I Hate the IRS,” who was about to mail a $100,000 check to the IRS. Cost segregation studies on his 12 Denver-area rentals eliminated the liability. His CPA hadn’t recommended it because she believed it applied only to commercial property. Results depend on the owner's situation. Rules on passive rental losses and depreciation recapture when a property is sold can change the math. She also pointed to manufacturers. A newer provision allows qualifying manufacturing buildings to be fully expensed rather than depreciated, so those owners may not need a cost segregation study at all. Before or after construction? Before, Serrano said. “The sooner we talk about the project, the better.” She cited an owner who built an Oakland office from shipping containers and welded them together because it was cheaper. Bolting them, so they could be taken apart, might have qualified far more of the building as five-year property. That may not have changed his choice, but he would have made it knowing the tax impact. He also demolished an existing structure without his CPA setting up a general asset account, and missed a tax benefit as a result. For cost segregation, she noted, what matters is when a building was bought and placed in service, not its age. Insurers look at age. Planning has to account for both. R&D Tax Credits for Real Estate and Construction Peters called the R&D credit “one of the worst named credits out there.” For tax purposes, it can cover work involving analysis, alternatives and design, not just scientists and software. In real estate, that can include: Engineers evaluating structural methods depending on contract terms HVAC and energy design to meet efficiency or LEED requirements Custom engineering to improve a building’s performance Manufacturers building capital-intensive facilities Investment in AI, built in-house or subcontracted, across industries His advice: don’t ask “do we do R&D?” Ask where the money and effort are going. What changed recently. From 2022 through 2024, research expenses had to be spread over five years or more instead of deducted right away, research expenses had to be amortized rather than deducted right away, which made the credit less attractive. Peters said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act fixed that going forward and, for some businesses, retroactively. Companies that stopped claiming the credit should reassess. Cost segregation vs. the R&D tax credit. Header Header R&D Tax Credit What it does Accelerates deductions, which lower taxable income A credit that reduces the tax owed dollar for dollar What can qualify, per the panel Shorter-lived components: flooring, cabinets, countertops, driveways, landscaping Structural engineering, HVAC and energy design, custom building systems, capital-intensive facilities When to look Before construction or acquisition decisions At the front end of a project Overlap - Custom HVAC and energy work often touch both, so owners can address them together Capital Improvements: Tax benefit and Insurability Do roof or HVAC upgrades lower insurance costs? Not directly, Gilmete said. But major carriers may refuse to quote older buildings that haven’t been upgraded. He described a Santa Clara property where the roof had to be replaced before A-rated carriers would consider it. On the tax side, Peters said custom engineering for HVAC or energy performance can qualify for the R&D credit. Keep the Decisions, Bring in the Experts The panel’s closing advice was about what to keep in-house. General CPAs may be excellent but lack this level of specialization. Serrano offers clients a second review by another CPA when their current CPA is unfamiliar with cost segregation. Bringing in specialists early to review tax incentives, cost segregation, contracts, insurance policies and risk tolerance lets the owner decide with a full picture. As Gilmete put it, the experts “fill out your dashboard, and then the owner gets to make decisions based on that dashboard.” This session is part of TFIF 2026.  To see how planning connects to talent, AI and team design, read, read Own the Core, Access the Rest: What The Future is Fractional (TFIF) 2026 Revealed About How Finance Teams Are Being Rebuilt   what finance leaders are rethinking about talent, AI and team structure.

Read More >
Blogs

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

For growing pass-through entities, the September 15 tax deadline often creates a collision between cash flow and internal capacity. Guessing at estimated payments leaves companies vulnerable to IRS penalties or unnecessarily traps critical working capital meant for Q4 growth. By establishing a Safe Harbor floor and utilizing the Annualized Income Installment Method, companies can align tax outlays directly with actual revenue. When this execution is handled proactively, finance leaders stop playing defense against deadlines and reclaim their time for strategic planning. When a high-growth pass-through entity, such as an S-Corp or a Partnership, comes off an unexpectedly strong summer, revenue is up. This should be a moment for leadership to celebrate and plan their Q4 investments. Instead, the internal finance team often finds themselves staring down a cash crunch they didn't anticipate. The pressure point is September 15. For growing operations, this date is often a collision course. It is not only the deadline for Q3 estimated tax payments, but it is also the extended filing deadline for Forms 1065 and 1120-S . When you have an internal team trying to finalize the previous year's historical data while simultaneously projecting the current year's performance, the structure usually begins to strain. This isn't about a team dropping the ball. It's simply what happens when internal workflows haven't scaled up to match a company's growth. When two major deadlines collide, and the volume is too high, a stretched team has no choice but to improvise. The Cost of "Guesstimating" In a pass-through entity, the business itself generally does not pay federal income tax. Because income from partnerships and S corporations generally passes through to their owners, owners may need to make individual estimated tax payments based in part on their share of the entity’s taxable income When internal teams don't have a dedicated workflow for this, they often get bogged down trying to predict exact year-end profits during a busy quarter. Without a clear mechanism to manage this, I frequently see companies do one of two things: they either underpay and leave themselves vulnerable to IRS penalties, or they overpay to "be safe." Overpaying might feel like the responsible choice in the moment, but it unnecessarily ties up working capital. When these distributions are sized off gross revenue rather than a projection that accounts for deductions or state-level elections, the company pulls more cash out of the operating account than the owners actually owe. That excess traps liquidity that could have been used to fund critical Q4 growth initiatives—like a marketing push or inventory expansion—without seeking outside financing. Establishing an Estimated-Tax Safe Harbor  When our tax professionals step in to manage this process, the very first thing we do is establish a predictable foundation. We immediately build a "Tax Compliance Calendar" integrated with a "Safe Harbor Floor." A useful starting point is determining which estimated-tax safe harbor applies. For many taxpayers, one option is to base required annual payments on 100% of the prior year's tax, increasing to 110% for certain higher-income taxpayers. The current-year 90% test may also apply. Meeting the applicable requirements through timely payments can generally reduce exposure to estimated-tax underpayment penalties. Once that floor is established, we can adjust for the reality of the current year. Aligning Outlays with Actual Cash Flow If a company sees a massive spike in revenue during Q3, the standard installment method might demand a payment that creates a sudden cash flow imbalance. Good intentions won't balance the cash flow at this stage; you need a precise mathematical approach. To stabilize cash flow during a sudden revenue surge, one strategy to consider is the Annualized Income Installment Method . Instead of assuming income is earned evenly throughout the year, the Annualized Income Installment Method determines the owner's required installments based more closely on income earned during the applicable annualization periods State-level PTE tax elections may also provide federal tax benefits by allowing qualifying state income taxes to be paid and deducted at the entity level rather than being subject to the individual SALT deduction limitation. The result? Depending on the state's PTE tax regime, entity-level payments may reduce the state estimated-tax payments otherwise required from individual owners. A deductible PTE tax payment may also reduce the taxable income passed through to owners for federal purposes, which can affect their projected federal estimated-tax liability. Restoring Strategic Headspace When tax planning is handled consistently throughout the year, it changes how a leadership team operates. It can significantly reduce the risk of an "April Surprise." When Q3 estimates are calculated accurately and tied to a deliberate strategy, leadership knows exactly how much capital is truly theirs to spend. Tax shifts from a looming, unpredictable liability into a manageable line item. Just as importantly, the internal finance leader gets their time back. Instead of spending the first two weeks of September finalizing and issuing K-1s, calculating thresholds, and worrying about penalties, they can focus on high-level financial modeling and operational efficiency. A strong tax partner doesn't just run the numbers; they take the friction out of the process so your team can focus forward. When an experienced team handles the heavy lifting behind the scenes, you stop playing defense against IRS deadlines and start using tax strategy as a genuine tool to fund your growth. See how our tax professionals support growing operations and keep execution predictable. Let's talk through how we can support your finance function. Comparing Q3 Tax Strategies: Safe Harbor vs. Annualized Method vs. PTE Strategy Ideal for Primary Benefit Risk Level  100%/110% Safe Harbor  Rapidly growing companies  Provides protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied  Low (May temporarily tie up cash if revenue drops)  Annualized Method  Seasonal or late-year spiking revenue Align tax outlays directly with timing of taxable income  Moderate (Requires meticulous record-keeping) PTE Tax Election Entities in high-tax states May provide an entity-level federal deduction for qualifying state income taxes while providing state tax benefits to eligible owners Low (Requires state-specific eligibility and election compliance) Key Takeaways: The Deadline Collision: The simultaneous timing of Q3 estimates and extended historical filings places severe strain on internal finance teams when workflows haven't scaled. The Cost of "Guesstimating": Overpaying estimated taxes based on gross revenue ties up liquidity that could otherwise fund critical Q4 growth initiatives without requiring outside financing. Building a Safe Harbor Floor: Establishing a baseline payment based on 100% or 110% of the prior year's tax liability can provide protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when the applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied. Aligning Cash Flow: The Annualized Income Installment Method stabilizes cash positions by calculating tax based on income earned during the applicable annualization periods rather than an arbitrary quarterly fraction. Restoring Strategic Headspace: When tax planning is handled reliably behind the scenes, internal finance leaders get their time back to focus on high-level financial modeling instead of chasing K-1s.

Read More >
Blogs

How to Scale a Fractional CFO Practice: Infrastructure, AI, and Execution

How to Scale a Fractional CFO Practice: Infrastructure, AI, and Execution

Fractional CFOs scale by separating strategy from daily execution. At the CFO Leadership Conference in Boston, panelists outlined the model: a three-part team structure, AI tools for repetitive analysis, and strict scope boundaries. The common thread is that strategic capacity depends on reliable accounting operations underneath it. Fractional CFOs operate in a fundamentally different model, balancing multiple clients and shifting priorities without the benefit of deep organizational embedding. You are hired to provide altitude, clarity, and rapid impact. But when a client lacks a mature finance operation, that executive focus is quickly consumed by operational cleanup. This exact tension took center stage at the CFO Leadership Conference in Boston. During our morning panel discussion, The Multi-Business Executive: How Fractional CFOs Scale Leadership Across Clients , moderated by Scrubbed’s Accounting Director Arian David, Triangle Coffee founder and fractional CFO Ottavio Siani and Scrubbed’s CFO Aira Pineda detailed how fractional CFOs build capacity to avoid this operational trap. They mapped out the real-world infrastructure and AI practices required to support multiple fast-moving client environments. Here are the operational realities shared in the room. The Infrastructure Blueprint for Scaling a Fractional CFO Practice A primary challenge for scaling organizations is the gap between strategic desires and foundational accuracy. Volume increases faster than structure, and founders frequently bottleneck their own operations by micromanaging the finance function. As Aira shared with the room, stepping into a fractional role often means untangling founder-led accounting and directly telling the CEO, "you're not supposed to do this". Once leaders step back from the daily execution, "suddenly they have time" to actually focus on growing their business. Successful practitioners build a deliberate team architecture to handle the volume. To build a sustainable infrastructure, Ottavio explained that a fractional CFO setup requires three key elements: A fractional CFO to provide strategic direction. A trusted internal employee to manage sensitive operational context. An external accounting firm to run the daily numbers. This structure prevents the CFO from becoming the operational bottleneck. Read: Are Fractional CFOs the Future for Growing Companies? Navigating Risk in Founder-Led Environments The most pointed friction in a fractional role often comes from enforcing structure. During the session, an audience member challenged the panel on how to balance strict risk controls with the commercial reality of working for independent founders who operate as the "gods of their own businesses". Aira addressed this tension directly, clarifying that operational controls and commercial growth do not have to collide.  "I don't think it's contradictory, to be honest. I think it's complementary," she explained.   "I think you make better decisions as a CFO, having kind of just at the back of your mind that risk mindset." Taking calculated risks is necessary to create shareholder value. However, a fractional CFO can only support that aggressive growth when the foundational accounting operations are secure enough to absorb the complexity. Building Fractional CFO Capacity with AI Tools Technology accelerates this architecture when carefully managed. Ottavio shared how he uses Claude to generate monthly financial statement analyses based on tested templates, reducing a repetitive task to minutes. Arian detailed using Claude to abstract private equity contracts, while Aira highlighted using NotebookLM to summarize 50-page forensic documents. However, systems create results, but human professionals must validate them. Aira illustrated the danger of false confidence by testing a complex revenue recognition issue across Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT. Although all three models provided the exact same answer, they failed the final human review when  "A big CPA firm comes and says, no, that's not the accounting treatment." Designing Aligned Execution and Preventing Scope Creep Growth adds complexity. Strong execution ensures that complexity remains manageable. When fractional leaders possess a reliable accounting layer, closes become predictable and strategic conversations gain traction. Without this layer, scope creep inevitably takes over. "I think a challenge with being a fractional CFO is having to limit your scope, right?" Ottavio noted. "I typically dedicate like a day a week, and I need to keep myself from spending too much time outside of the original scope that we, we agreed upon, so that I can make sure that I'm kind of meeting all my clients". Key Takeaways: A sustainable fractional CFO practice separates strategy from execution: the CFO, a trusted internal employee, and an external accounting team each hold a distinct role. Founders bottleneck their own operations by staying in the daily accounting. Helping them step back frees time for growth. Risk mindset and commercial growth are complementary. Calculated risks require stable accounting operations underneath them. AI tools like Claude and NotebookLM compress repetitive analysis from weeks to minutes, but experienced professionals must verify every output against source documents. Scope discipline holds only when a reliable accounting layer runs the day-to-day work. About the Panelists Arian David | Accounting Director, Scrubbed  Arian serves as the Accounting Director for Retail and Distribution at Scrubbed. She brings over 12 years of specialized execution experience managing complex accounting operations across the distribution, e-commerce, and retail sectors.  Aira Pineda | CFO, Scrubbed  Aira directs financial strategy and operations as the Chief Financial Officer at Scrubbed. She brings over a decade of hands-on experience operating as a fractional CFO for small to medium-sized enterprises. Ottavio Siani | Fractional CFO & Founder, Triangle Coffee  Ottavio is the founder of Triangle Coffee, a multi-location café business operating in Boston and Washington, D.C. As an active fractional CFO, he advises a portfolio of clients, including Hon, CN Naturals, and Port of Mocha, on building and restructuring finance teams. 

Read More >

Links

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.