The Backbone of Effective Internal Control: Understanding IPE and MRC

Julemm Banag
Julemm Banag

Director, Risk Advisory Group

The Backbone of Effective Internal Control: Understanding IPE and MRC
In Episode 2 of The Beehive Podcast, titled “The Backbone of Effective Internal Control: Understanding IPE and MRC,” host William sits down with expert auditors and risk advisory experts, Matthew Gopez and Precylou Burburan to dive into the intricate world of internal controls. The discussion spotlights two critical components: Information Produced by the Entity (IPE) and Management Review Controls (MRC). These systems are vital for mitigating risk, ensuring compliance, and driving better decision-making in today’s dynamic business environment.

Why Internal Controls Matter

IPE encompasses the data produced within an organization—whether through IT systems, applications, or manual processes. It is the foundation of transactions, financial reporting, and operational decisions. MRC, on the other hand, involves management’s evaluation and validation of this data to ensure accuracy and reliability. Strong internal controls are especially critical in areas like nonprofit financial reporting, risk and SOX compliance, where transparency and accountability are key to maintaining donor trust and regulatory compliance.
As Precylou explains, “IPE is what management uses in the execution of controls, while MRC ensures that financial information is accurate and reasonable.” Together, they form the backbone of an effective internal control system, helping businesses safeguard their data and make informed decisions.

Discover how our Risk Advisory Team can strengthen your internal controls.

Why These Controls Are Critical

Properly managing IPE and MRC is crucial in a business world increasingly defined by audits and compliance requirements. Regulatory bodies like the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board often highlight deficiencies in these areas. Failing to validate IPE or implement effective MRC can lead to data inaccuracies, compliance violations, and financial mismanagement.

Matthew emphasizes, “The significance of IPE and MRC lies in their ability to build trust and drive operational efficiency while minimizing risks.” Whether you’re a startup or an established company, mastering these controls is essential for long-term resilience. That’s why many businesses turn to corporate finance advisory services for guidance in building stronger governance frameworks.

Read our blog on Mitigating Biotech Accounting and Financial Reporting Risks.

Real-World Applications of IPE and MRC

IPE can take many forms, from system-generated aging reports and trial balances to reconciliation documents in formats like PDF, CSV, or Excel. These serve as the groundwork for MRC, where management analyzes this data for accuracy.
For example, a balance sheet reconciliation control might involve validating IPE like a system screenshot of the trial balance or sub-ledger reports. This simple yet essential process demonstrates the interplay between IPE and MRC in maintaining operational integrity.

Watch our Risk Advisory video on managing crucial controls for CPA firms.

Why Listen to Episode 2?

This episode offers actionable insights, including:
  • Understanding the scope of Information Produced by the Entity (IPE).
  • The critical role of Management Review Controls (MRC) in organizational governance.
  • IPE as a cornerstone for data-driven decision-making.
  • MRC as a strategic tool for proactive risk management.
  • Key challenges and threats impacting IPE quality.
  • KStrategies to enhance IPE reliability and accuracy.
  • Ready to strengthen your internal controls and safeguard your business?


Tune in to Episode 2 of The Beehive Podcast—The Backbone of Effective Internal Control: Understanding IPE and MRC. Discover how mastering IPE and MRC can reduce risk, boost compliance, and drive better decisions.

How Scrubbed Can Help

Contact Scrubbed to ensure your business applies the revenue recognition standard correctly with expert support

CONTACT US
How Scrubbed Can Help

Related Content

Blogs

Optimizing the Financial Health of Your Non Profit Organization

Optimizing the Financial Health of Your Non Profit Organization

While nonprofits are critical to supporting the overall health of organizations, causes and individuals across the world, the global COVID-19 pandemic had a notably negative impact on the health and well-being of these vital organizations. More than 7 percent of nonprofits are expected to close in the wake of the pandemic, resulting in 1 million lost jobs, according to Independent Sector . A healthy nonprofit starts with a strong financial foundation, yet many organizations struggle with finances, accounting and budgeting—nearly one-third of nonprofits face cash reserve issues, according to a GuideStar report . Nevertheless, nonprofits can strengthen their bottom line and future prospects by honing in on and updating their strategic and financial planning. The following tips and strategies can further o ptimize the financial health of your nonprofit organization , serving to support its long-term growth and mission: Update your strategic plan. One of the aims of a solid strategic plan is to keep everyone in an organization on the same page and moving in the same positive direction. Returning regularly to your strategic plan can remind both your leadership team and board of your overarching goals and reset the focus on finances, as needed. It is imperative that your strategic plan functions as a living document, rather than something you create once and set aside. Let it be a guide for your financial and program objectives and a tool for your financial team to rely on as you follow the key strategic goals and financial plans you have established. Bolster your operating reserve. When you systematically move money in smaller amounts to your operating reserve, you avoid a common conundrum. Unfortunately, many nonprofits have less than one month of available operating reserves on hand. Rather than waiting for large windfalls, commit to regular additions to your operating reserve to support your organization’s overall health and performance. Find the right balance of board members. Every successful board includes a team that balances leadership, financial, marketing and fundraising skills. The next time you have an opening on your board of directors, seek out leaders who are equally skilled at understanding balance sheets and raising funds for future endeavors. Likewise, ensure your board has both experienced members and fresh ideas to support your organization’s financial future. If your board could use a refresh, consider adding additional members or updating term limits. Make decisions based on data. Organizations driven by data are a whopping 23 times more likely to acquire new customers and six times more likely to keep those customers, according to a McKinsey Global Institute study. Look to the data rather than making decisions based on past experience or emotions. This way, you can make logical decisions that will drive revenue, entice donors and bolster your long-term financial picture.  As an added bonus, the right data demonstrates accountability to stakeholders. This type of transparency is more important than ever for nonprofit organizations. Invest in revenue-generating programs. Nonprofits that diversify revenue streams are often the same organizations posting the strongest revenue gains. If you aren’t already generating revenue from fundraising events, partnerships with local or national businesses, and new sponsorship opportunities, consider adding these to your plan. While grants are a valuable way to support your mission, revenue-generating programs can make a more significant impact. Add external experts to your team. Many smaller nonprofits have financial teams of one—or even one person who splits time between budgeting and marketing, for instance. If your organization is strapped for resources when it comes to internal accounting, it is wise to seek help from experts who understand the nuances of financial reporting and overall accounting for nonprofits. You can hire outside support to help you get over a particular hurdle or to benefit your long-term financial health and stability. Finally, regular communication with everyone at the table is a must. Your financial picture should never be a surprise or an emergency situation. Organizations that create a culture of transparency invite more voices, inspire greater confidence and maintain a more even keel. Ultimately, financial integrity is a hallmark of a great nonprofit. There is no one “right” or “perfect” balance sheet or strategic plan. But organizations that focus on communication, planning and adapting to changing circumstances tend to enjoy greater success. When your financial health is strong and stable, you can spend more of your time and resources on sharing your mission, supporting others and building towards the next generation. If your nonprofit could benefit from support with anything from basic bookkeeping to complex financial planning, the professionals at Scrubbed are passionate about helping nonprofits succeed and thrive. While our expertise includes nonprofit support, we also offer industry-specific services such as real estate accounting solutions tailored to organizations managing property assets. We also provide technical accounting support to ensure accuracy and compliance in more complex financial situations.  Please contact us at [email protected] or 800-837-5160 for project-based or ongoing help with accounting, reporting and any other financial needs.

Read More >
Blogs

Mastering ASC 842: How to Navigate Lease Accounting Challenges with Confidence

Mastering ASC 842: How to Navigate Lease Accounting Challenges with Confidence

ASC 842 was introduced to increase transparency by requiring companies to bring most leases onto the balance sheet. But in practice, the implementation has been anything but simple. In Episode 7 of The Beehive Podcast, “Mastering ASC 842: Navigating Lease Accounting Challenges,” we sat down with lease accounting experts Lord Gen Rilloraza and Gliezel David to explore how businesses are adapting to ASC 842—and what firms can do to help their clients stay compliant, audit-ready, and confident. The Ongoing Challenges of ASC 842 From classifying lease components to uncovering embedded agreements, companies are still navigating ASC 842 with limited success. Some of the most pressing issues we have identified include: Distinguishing lease vs. non-lease components properly Measuring variable lease payments accurately Identifying embedded leases within broader contracts Accounting for lease modifications and business acquisitions Performing timely impairment assessments of ROU assets These challenges can significantly affect financial statements, investor perceptions, and regulatory compliance. As Lord Gen notes, “Management should also pay extra attention to areas that require judgments and estimates,” emphasizing how small technical issues can quickly snowball if left unchecked. Common Problems Encountered With ASC 842 Both Lord Gen and Gliezel shared that while most clients have implemented ASC 842 in form, applying it in substance is where they often fall short. Many missteps stem from underestimating the ongoing nature of lease accounting. As Gliezel pointed out, “There are leases embedded within larger arrangements or contracts not explicitly tagged as leases,” such as equipment provided under service agreements or buildouts included in advertising contracts. Another challenge arises with variable lease payments. According to Lord Gen, “Payments based on CPI are measured using the index or rate prevailing at lease commencement,” but companies often overlook this, leading to inaccurate liability recognition. Furthermore, when it comes to changes in lease terms or business combinations, there’s a need for careful reassessment. “During acquisitions, the related leases will now be re-measured,” Gliezel explained, highlighting the importance of treating acquired leases as if they’re brand new under the acquiring entity’s accounting policies. How Firms Can Turn ASC 842 Challenges to Strategic Opportunity Rather than viewing ASC 842 as just another compliance checkbox, firms have the opportunity to turn it into a strategic advantage for themselves and their clients. By providing targeted support, firms can: Help clients assess contracts holistically and flag embedded leases Advise on when to separate or combine lease components based on financial implications Guide accurate accounting for modifications and acquisitions Ensure impairment assessments are built into regular close processes Establish frameworks for internal controls and review mechanisms ASC 842 will continue to evolve as new scenarios arise. But with the right processes and guidance in place, firms can help clients avoid costly missteps and turn compliance into opportunity. As Gliezel aptly noted, “ Although the new standards have been effective for a few years now, challenges still arise as we continuously comply.” That’s where advisors step in. Not just to interpret the rules, but to create clarity, build trust, and strengthen strategic decision-making. Why Listen to Episode 7? In this episode of The Beehive, you’ll learn about: How to identify lease and non-lease components effectively under ASC 842 Key considerations for firms when dealing with variable lease payments The importance of identifying embedded leases in broader contracts Best practices for handling lease modifications and business combinations When and how to assess right-of-use (ROU) assets for impairment Strategies to strengthen your firm’s advisory capabilities while ensuring compliance

Read More >
Blogs

Climate Accountability: Navigating California’s Climate Disclosure Laws

Climate Accountability: Navigating California’s Climate Disclosure Laws

As the world’s fourth-largest economy, California has taken proactive steps to combat climate change by mandating firms within its jurisdiction to report greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks starting in 2025. On October 7, 2023, Governor Gavin Newsom signed a groundbreaking climate disclosure law package including three key acts: California Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosures (AB 1305) SB 253 and SB 261 are the first general regulations in the US requiring companies to report their greenhouse gas emissions and climate risks, while AB 1305 aims to prevent misleading claims about emissions, known as greenwashing. These laws mark a significant shift towards mandatory climate-related disclosure for companies operating in California. AB 1305 applies to all public and private firms, irrespective of revenue. Moreover, the disclosure mandated by AB 1305 must be prominently displayed on the company’s website and updated at least annually. Failure to do so may result in civil penalties of up to $2,500 per day per violation, not exceeding $500,000. While AB 1305 is set to take effect on January 1, 2024, Mr. Jesse Gabriel, the bill’s author, has clarified the timing of disclosures. In a letter addressed to the Chief Clerk of the Assembly, Mr. Gabriel indicated that while the bill does not explicitly outline the timeline for initial disclosures, he intends for the first annual disclosure to be published no later than January 1, 2025. Looking for an Expert with Innovative Solutions for a Rapidly Changing ESG Landscape? Click here! 1. The term “doing business in California” is unclear in either bill. Further clarification regarding the definition of the term is expected in the future. However, it is defined by the State here . 2. Revenues are not required to be earned exclusively in California. 3. Note that a subsidiary is not required to prepare a separate climate-related financial risk report if consolidated reports are prepared. Furthermore, if a covered entity does not complete a report consistent with all required disclosures, the covered entity shall provide the recommended disclosures to the best of its ability, provide a detailed explanation for any reporting gaps, and describe steps the covered entity will take to prepare complete disclosures. 4. A nonprofit emissions reporting organization contracted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop a reporting program to receive and make publicly available disclosures that has experience with GHG emissions disclosure. Following the Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards , companies must start working on identifying their GHG emissions sources, selecting an appropriate calculation approach, collecting data and determining emission factors, investing in calculation tools, and rolling up the data to corporate and reporting levels. SB 261   requires disclosures following the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidelines, which requires the disclosures of the following key matters: Governance -  TCFD requires companies to describe their board’s oversight of climate-related risk and opportunities, including (a) the process and frequency the board is informed about climate-related issues, (b) whether climate-related issues are considered on board strategies and other business decisions, and (c) how the board monitors and oversees the process against goals and targets for addressing climate-related issues. Companies should also describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities. Strategy -  Disclosures should include information about a company’s climate-related risks and opportunities over the short, medium, and long term, describe its impact on the company’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning, and describe the resilience of the company’s strategy, considering different climate-related scenarios. Risk management -  Companies should disclose their processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks. This includes information on how the organization identifies and prioritizes climate-related risks, measures to mitigate them, and any associated financial implications. Metrics and targets -  TCFD requires companies to disclose specific metrics and targets related to climate-related risks and opportunities. This may include GHG emissions, energy consumption, water usage, and other relevant indicators. Companies should also disclose any targets they have set to address these issues and their progress towards achieving them. Preparing for New Disclosures All firms operating in California must start incorporating climate considerations into governance, risk management, and strategy. Establishing a cross-functional task force can ease the burden of organizing the company around the extensive impacts of the laws, which includes comprehensive data collection from both internal and external sources. Key initial steps to take include: Assessing and refining materiality determination: Once companies identify which law applies to them and review the required data, they need to shift their focus to relevant ESG topics, considering the needs of their internal and external stakeholders. Additionally, companies should evaluate their existing climate-specific or industry-specific disclosures, prepared under established standards and frameworks such as the GHG Protocol or TCFD, adapting them as necessary. Identifying gaps: Companies must review the new regulatory requirements and timelines to determine the necessary changes and evaluate existing preparedness. This information facilitates coordinated data requirements with relevant internal stakeholders and process owners, including the board and C-suite leaders. Evaluating processes, controls, and readiness: Entities can scrutinize their current internal control and data governance systems to assign roles and responsibilities for data ownership. Boards can develop oversight and top-down accountability mechanisms to support a controlled environment, enabling leaders to efficiently address climate, GHG disclosure, and control gaps. These measures can expedite ESG reporting within the Form 10-K filing timeline. Investing in education, upskilling, and action: Providing training and other learning opportunities for the board and executive levels enhances the organizational capabilities necessary for assurance preparedness. Networking with relevant stakeholders, such as financial reporting and sustainability teams, can aid in drafting and finalizing disclosures related to climate and ESG emissions. How Scrubbed Can Help Given the comprehensive scope and timing considerations of the bills, planning for ESG regulation compliance now is a must. Establishing a multidisciplinary team comprising seasoned experts proficient in ESG accounting and regulatory nuances is necessary to help your company speed up aggregating, structuring, and formulating the required reporting protocols.  Partnering with an outsourced accounting team like Scrubbed can give you access to to specialized ESG reporting services without the burden of hiring in-house. Reach out to Scrubbed today to harness the knowledge of our ESG professionals and streamline your organization’s compliance journey toward seamless adherence to regulatory mandates.  Disclaimer: The information contained herein is general and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. It is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional services. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act upon such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. *Disclaimer: Services being offered do not require a state license. **Special thanks to Sharole Gay Hael for her valuable contribution to this article.

Read More >

Links

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.