The CPA Firm’s Roadmap to Meeting Tight Audit Deadlines

Roland Monasterial

Roland Monasterial

External Audit Manager, Firm Practice and Risk Assessment Support Services

The CPA Firm’s Roadmap to Meeting Tight Audit Deadlines

Every CPA firm knows the rhythm of the busy audit season: the long hours, the constant pressure, and the impossible balance between speed and accuracy. But what used to be a seasonal challenge has become a deeper structural issue for the profession.


With fewer accounting graduates entering the field, growing client demands, and increasing audit complexity, firms can no longer rely on sheer effort to meet deadlines. CPA firm turnover is averaging around 15% nationally and nearly 71% of Big 4 auditors reporting mental health worries due to work pressures. The old model, hire more people, work more hours, simply doesn’t scale.


The firms finding success today are the ones rethinking their audit approach. They’re replacing reactive, deadline-driven habits with proactive systems built on planning, visibility, and smart capacity management.


This roadmap provides five core, actionable strategies that move beyond wishful thinking and establish a disciplined, collaborative framework to ensure timely completion without sacrificing the integrity of the audit.


Step 1: Strategic Planning

The planning phase is where you negotiate reality, manage expectations, and build essential time buffers to protect your team. Here’s how this step usually goes:


Setting Realistic Timelines

The single most destructive action in deadline management is setting a one-sided, unrealistic deadline without client input. This only creates resentment and guarantees delays.


Suggested Action: Schedule a dedicated meeting with key client stakeholders early in the process. Use this time to negotiate and agree on an achievable timeline for deliverables, fieldwork, and final sign-off. This collaborative approach manages expectations on both sides and sets a realistic, mutually accepted path forward. When the client agrees to the timeline, they inherently take ownership of meeting their own deliverables, dramatically improving their response time.


Buffering for Client Delays

Even the most collaborative client will face unexpected internal hiccups. If your internal deadline is the same as the final delivery date, you have no recourse when issues arise. You need built-in protection.


Suggested Action: The usual buffer to set is an internal deadline of two days before the official one. This two-day margin serves as your firm’s safety net. Furthermore, when communicating with the client, give them a one or two-day window to provide the necessary information before your internal deadline. This proactive strategy ensures that if the client misses their internal date by a day or two, your firm’s final schedule remains protected, insulating your team from external chaos.


Step 2: Focused Execution

Once the timeline is set, execution must be focused on ensuring maximum audit efficiency and professional skepticism is applied where it matters most.


Prioritizing High-Risk Audits

The most efficient audit is not the one that finishes every section fastest but the one that allocates the most senior resources to the areas carrying the highest risk.


Suggested Action: Accounts that carry the highest risk of material misstatement must be prioritized and tackled first in peak season. These are the areas that will receive the most extensive and/or detailed audit procedures and require the judgment of senior staff.


Common priority areas include: revenue and related accounts (such as Accounts Receivable and Cash), Inventories, Complex accounts (like derivatives or specialized equity), and accounts flagged during planning due to weak internal controls. By front-loading the heavy, high-risk lifting, you surface critical issues early when there is still time to resolve them.


Avoiding Bottlenecks

Bottlenecks are inevitable, but their impact is manageable. Delays typically stem from a few common issues: a client’s slow response to requests, unexpected material events or errors, and the discovery of mistakes from previous audits. It’s common to encounter one, or even all, of these hurdles during an audit.


Suggested Action: When an audit encounters one or more of these hurdles, do not proceed in silence. The moment the delay is quantified, you must immediately renegotiate a new, achievable timeline with the client. Trying to push through an unexpected week-long delay on the original schedule will only lead to rushed, sub-par work. Anticipating and communicating delays early is the hallmark of professional project management.


Using Project Trackers

While sophisticated audit software exists, the core need remains visibility and accountability for both the firm and the client.


Suggested Action: Maintain a simple, centralized project tracker. Often, keeping an Excel file is the most effective low-tech solution. This tracker should monitor the progress of each audit area and, crucially, track what is still needed from the client (the Pending Client List, or PBC). Clear, shared tracking ensures everyone knows the exact status of the engagement and holds the client accountable for their outstanding items.


Step 3: Expand Capacity Through Strategic Partnership

Even with great planning and process discipline, there’s one reality every CPA firm faces: capacity. This capacity constraint creates the unavoidable bottlenecks that these strategies are designed to mitigate, especially given that the unemployment rate for auditors sits at 2.0%. The talent shortage is the bottleneck.


The most effective solution to this crisis is leveraging the dedicated, experienced offshore accounting professionals from Scrubbed. This will allow your firm to instantly scale capacity for high-volume tasks without the overhead or long lead time of permanent hiring, establishing the firm’s forward-looking strategy.


Here’s how we make it possible:


  • Audit Support. We handle all your testing, confirmations, and workpaper preparation so your team can focus on analysis and client relationships.
  • Tax Preparation and Compliance. From 1040 and 1120 returns to nonprofit filings, we can help you ensure timely and compliant submissions even during the busy seasons.
  • Accounting and Bookkeeping. We manage your daily bookkeeping, account reconciliations, and month-end close activities, so your team can dedicate more time to strategic initiatives.
  • Transaction and Advisory Support. For firms providing M&A, valuation, or due diligence, we deliver the support you need to strengthen your advisory engagements.

As a long-time partner to CPA firms of all sizes, Scrubbed provides access to highly trained accounting and audit professionals who work seamlessly as part of your extended team. We follow your firm’s methodology, align with your tools and standards, and deliver consistent, high-quality work.


Beyond Just Meeting the Deadline

Meeting tight deadlines shouldn’t come at the expense of your team’s well-being or your firm’s reputation. With the right systems and the right partners in place, it’s possible to deliver every audit on time, with the quality and confidence your clients expect.


The ultimate benefit is not just a timely report either, but a sustainable practice. Leveraging proactive steps and strategic partnerships like Scrubbed allows CPA firms to reduce staff stress and burnout, increase the efficiency of review cycles, and consistently deliver high-quality reports, solidifying trust with clients.


Don’t let the next busy season dictate your schedule. Partner with Scrubbed to build a resource plan that helps your team meet deadlines without burnout, and deliver quality audits every time.

Related Content

Blogs

How Biotech Firms Prepare Financials for IPO

How Biotech Firms Prepare Financials for IPO

Biotech IPOs experienced a surge in 2021, with more than 100 deals raising billions in fresh capital. However, enthusiasm cooled quickly. By 2022, deal volume dropped dramatically, and in 2024, only 24 US biopharma IPOs were completed, the lowest number in more than a decade.Despite this decline, the year ended with signs of recovery. According to GlobalData, the global biotech IPOs in 2024 raised $8.52 billion across 50 deals, the strongest performance since 2021. Investors, however, are becoming cautious and highly selective, favoring firms with later-stage pipelines and strong financial discipline.In this climate, financial preparation is the difference between stumbling through an IPO and stepping into the public markets with confidence. Partnering with specialized experts ensures that your firm is ready when opportunity arrives. To facilitate a successful IPO, here are the key steps biotech firms should take to prepare their financials:1. Start with a Strategic IPO RoadmapMost biotech firms begin preparing for an IPO 12 to 24 months prior to filing. This lead time is crucial, especially since meeting SEC reporting requirements, obtaining audited financial statements, and implementing system upgrades cannot be done overnight.A Reuters survey of healthcare executives in late 2024 reflected this cautious reality: while 64% expected more IPOs in 2025, many anticipated only modest growth compared to the historic highs of 2020 – 2021. With market timing still uncertain and investors highly selective, firms that create a structured plan, covering accounting, governance, and reporting milestones, will be in the best position to move quickly when the right window opens.2. Build Scalable, Compliant Financial Reporting Systems and ProcessesOne of the biggest challenges for biotech firms preparing for an IPO is upgrading their financial reporting systems and processes to meet public company standards. Many operate with lean finance teams and systems designed for private reporting. However, going public necessitates a significant step up in rigor, speed, and transparency.Some key elements to focus on include:Internal controls that meet Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, particularly SOX 404, which mandates an annual assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting.GAAP-compliant accounting policies and processes that address critical and complex areas, such as Revenue Recognition (ASC 606) for collaboration and licensing agreements, R&D Costs (ASC 730), which must be expensed as incurred, the classification of Financial Instruments as debt or equity, and the accounting for Intangible Assets.Scalable systems that can manage quarterly SEC reporting and investor communications effectively.Investing in these systems early can help reduce the risk of costly errors and position finance teams to meet tight deadlines once the firm goes public.3. Prepare and Audit Historical Financial StatementsThe SEC typically requires biotech firms to present at least two years of audited financial statements (sometimes three), along with interim quarterly data. These reports must meet PCAOB standards, which are more stringent than audits for private firms. A key distinction is the requirement for auditors to review and report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR).This phase can be particularly complex for biotech firms, whose expenses are often R&D-driven and may include licensing deals, milestone payments, and joint venture arrangements.As EisnerAmper notes, the IPO process is “stressful and lengthy,” and should never be left to the last minute. For biotech firms with limited finance teams, the challenge is even greater. Fortunately, there are several things you can do to reduce delays once the IPO process is underway, such as engaging auditors early, closing historical books cleanly, and addressing technical accounting questions ahead of time.4. Manage Cap Tables, Valuation, and ForecastsBiotech firms often have complicated capitalization tables, especially after multiple funding rounds involving preferred stock, convertible notes, or warrants. This complexity can create challenges in analyzing financial instruments for features such as beneficial conversion features or embedded derivatives, which may affect their classification as debt or equity.Valuation also presents unique challenges. Unlike commercial-stage companies, pre-revenue biotech firms often rely on the potential of their drug pipelines and future market opportunities for their valuations. In today’s environment, investors have become significantly more discerning.As Wellington Management observed in 2025, biotech IPO investors are focusing on valuation discipline, differentiation, and clinical maturity when assessing new offerings. This indicates that while early-stage science may excite venture investors, the public markets expect more clinical and financial proof points before committing capital.5. Form the Right IPO TeamAn IPO requires a cross-functional team of auditors, attorneys, investment bankers, and investor relations professionals. Within the firm, the finance team plays a crucial role by collaborating with external advisors to draft the S-1, prepare roadshow materials, and respond to due diligence inquiries.For biotech firms, having a reliable outsourced team adds a layer of financial discipline, providing accounting support, IPO readiness consulting, and CPA-level expertise. This ensures financial accuracy and consistency while freeing up leadership to focus on science, strategy, and investor engagement.6. Practice Due Diligence and Run IPO SimulationsInvestor and regulatory due diligence for biotech IPOs can be particularly intensive. In addition to financial reviews, biotech firms face scrutiny over intellectual property, clinical trial data, and regulatory filings. By conducting mock diligence sessions and IPO “practice periods”, you can identify weaknesses before they become obstacles.The Financial Times recently highlighted how Boston’s biotech hub, once booming, has been rattled by funding slowdowns and policy uncertainty This has made investors more selective about which firms to back, which shows that practicing IPO routines, from documentation to financial mock runs, is more important than ever.7. Craft a Compelling IPO Narrative and Communications PlanThat said, numbers alone won’t carry a biotech IPO. Investors seek a clear financial narrative that connects the science to the strategy. A compelling story highlights how capital raised will be utilized, how long current funding will last, and what milestones investors can expect.And strong financial storytelling requires accurate, timely, and transparent reporting. This is another area where outsourcing can help biotech firms, ensuring the numbers support the narrative and instill confidence in prospective investors.8. Plan for Post-IPO SustainabilityThe IPO is just the beginning. Once public, biotech firms must maintain the following:Quarterly and annual SEC reportingSarbanes-Oxley complianceInvestor relations and financial communicationsLeadership must also balance financial transparency with the unpredictable timelines of drug development. The firms that plan for sustainability beyond the IPO, by establishing robust systems and securing the right partners, will be best positioned for long-term success.ConclusionThe biotech IPO market is inherently cyclical, and the last few years have proven just how quickly conditions can change. In a market where investors are cautious and selective, it’s the firms that develop strong financial systems, effectively manage complex cap tables, and communicate a compelling narrative that stands out.By partnering with trusted experts like Scrubbed, biotech firms can successfully navigate the intricacies of IPO preparation and enter the public markets with confidence. We serve as an extension of your finance team, from preparing audited-ready financial statements and enhancing financial systems to supporting IPO readiness and ongoing compliance.If your biotech firm is considering an IPO or wants to explore what it would take to get IPO-ready, now is the time to start planning. Schedule a free consultation today and learn how our team of CPAs and financial experts can help you enter the public markets with confidence.

Read More >
Blogs

Customer Loyalty Programs: Achieving Success and Measuring Results

Customer Loyalty Programs: Achieving Success and Measuring Results

Attracting new customers sets the pace for expansion, but retaining them keeps the ball rolling. With growing competition in the retail market , building customer loyalty is one way for retail companies to stay top of mind for consumers. Hence, the need for Customer Loyalty Programs (CLPs).As CLPs progressed, numerous strategic variations arose to meet and fit customer preferences including Points-based, Tiered, Value-based, Gaming, and Cash-back Programs. Some well-known examples are:Starbucks Rewards ProgramThis rewards program is an example of a Gaming CLP. For every dollar spent, the customers earn “stars,” which, when accumulated, can, be redeemed for an extra cup of coffee, a slice of cake, or even exclusive coffee merch.The North Face XPLR PassFormerly known as the VIPeak, this program is an example of the Point-based CLP, which grants customers 1 point for every $1 spent online or in-store. For every 100 points accumulated, the customer gets a $10 reward to use on the gear they love.CLPs are not stand-alone, they are complementary to sales, which is why they also affect how we account for revenues following the 5-step revenue recognition model required under ASC 606. The Revenue 5-step Model of ASC 606The core principle of ASC 606 is that revenue recognition must depict the transfer of the promised goods or services to the customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  To address this core principle, ASC 606 requires companies to follow the five (5) steps model shown in the diagram below:Implementation of CLPs significantly affects a company’s revenue recognition process, particularly steps 2, 4, and 5 above. Step 2: Identify The Performance ObligationsPerformance obligations are promises to transfer distinct goods and services to the customers. Under ASC 606-10-25-19, goods and services are distinct only if: (1) They are capable of being distinct, the benefit from them can either be on their own or together with other readily available resources; and (2) the goods or services within the context of the contract, are distinct, which means the company’s promise to transfer these to the customers is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.Establishing CLPs means granting customers the right to acquire free or discounted goods or services in the future, giving rise to two obligations  (1) The delivery of the goods or services promised; and (2) The future fulfillment of the rights granted.. In the case of CLPs, ASC 606 requires that for this right to give rise to a performance obligation, the CLP should provide a material right to the customer, and the customer would not have received such right without entering into that contract. If the rights granted qualify, considerations received for these sales must be allocated to these obligations,The standard does not specify the qualifications or the definition of material rights. However, ASC 606-10-55-43 specifies that if the customers’ rights to acquire future goods or services would be at a price equivalent to the stand-alone selling price of those goods or services, then these rights do not provide the customers with a material right, even if these rights can be exercised only by entering into that contract. Step 4: Allocate the transaction priceASC 606 requires companies to allocate the transaction price to all the identified performance obligations in the contract, including the customers’ rights for additional goods or services under CLPs, provided these rights have passed the “material right” assessment under Step 2. Moreover, the standard requires that the transaction price be allocated based on the stand-alone selling prices of the goods or services provided to the customers. As defined, a stand-alone selling price is the price at which a company sells a promised good or service separately to a customer. In the case of CLPs, should the stand-alone selling price not be observable, ASC 606-10-55-44 requires companies to make sound estimations and adjust such estimates for both of the following:Discounts that customers could receive without exercising the rightThe likelihood that the right will be exercised.Step 5: Recognize the revenueThe amount of transaction price allocated to the rights under CLPs is, in effect, an advance payment from customers for their future purchase of goods or services. Therefore, the price allocated to these rights is initially recognized as a contract liability and will later be recognized as revenue when the performance obligation to deliver additional goods or services underlying the rights is fulfilled. To sum up, revenue from the rights shall be recognized when the customers exercise these rights and the Company delivers the goods or services. However, there may be instances when customers do not exercise all the rights granted. Thus, the concept of “Breakage” comes in.BreakageBreakage refers to unexercised rights that have lapsed or expired. ASC 606-10-55-48 states that if a company expects to be entitled to a breakage in a contract liability, the company should recognize the expected breakage amount as revenue based on a historical pattern of rights exercised by customers. In the case of CLPs, a company’s estimated breakage is considered as early as Step 4. As you may recall, ASC 606-10-55-44 requires entities to adjust their stand-alone selling price estimate considering the likelihood that the right will be exercised. For example, suppose a company expects that 80% of the points granted will be redeemed. In that case, the remaining 20% will be the initially estimated breakage and will be recognized as part of revenue. Revenue recognition for the breakage follows the pattern of the rights exercised or redeemed by the customers.Companies are required to reassess their breakage estimate every reporting period. Say, if as a result of the reassessment there is an increase from the initial assessed probability of exercise, this increase in estimate shall be accounted for as an additional liability. It should be noted that any changes in the estimate should be accounted for prospectively, and the original stand-alone selling price allocated to the rights should not be adjusted. For entities such as nonprofits, proper treatment of these estimates is also a crucial part of nonprofit financial reporting to ensure transparency and compliance with applicable accounting standards.Moreover, ASC 606-10-55-44 also states that if a company does not expect to be entitled to a breakage, the company should recognize the expected breakage amount as revenue only when the likelihood of exercising the remaining rights becomes remote. To determine whether the company expects to be entitled to a breakage amount, the company should consider the guidance on constraining estimates of variable consideration.Constraining Estimates of Variable ConsiderationThe transaction price shall include some or all of an amount of variable consideration estimated using either of the methods mentioned in ASC 606-10-32-8: expected value or most likely amount. However, the inclusion shall only be to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative amount of recognized revenue will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. In assessing this probability, the reversal’s likelihood and magnitude shall be considered.Presentation in the Statement of Financial PositionIt is noteworthy that although the standard uses the term ‘contract liability’, ASC 606 does not prohibit companies from using alternative descriptions in the statement of financial position (i.e., Loyalty program liability). However, for discussion purposes, the term ‘contract liability’ is used in this article.At the end of each reporting period, the company should assess and identify the amount of customer rights that will be presented as current and noncurrent contract liability in the Statement of Financial Position. The current portion of the contract liability should represent the estimated amount of customer rights that company expects to recognize as revenue in the next 12 months. The amount of customer rights expected to be recognized as revenue in the periods thereafter should be presented as part of the noncurrent contract liability.

Read More >
Blogs

From Aisles to Apps: How Online Shopping is Reshaping Business and Revenue Recognition

From Aisles to Apps: How Online Shopping is Reshaping Business and Revenue Recognition

Who doesn’t enjoy a bit of retail therapy? Most shoppers make purchases to lift their mood, while some buy items to celebrate special occasions. Whether it’s the stress of a busy week, personal challenges, or a milestone worth acknowledging, shopping can provide a much-needed escape and a moment of joy.Traditionally, this happened in physical stores—where customers could see, touch, and try products before buying. But today, e-commerce has taken the lead: a few taps now replace aisles and displays, with digital payments, personalized recommendations, and global reach making shopping easier and more accessible than ever.With this digital shift transforming the retail landscape, one big question arises: How is the digital shift impacting revenue recognition for the e-commerce industry?How to Recognize Revenue‍To fully understand the impact of e-commerce, it’s crucial to first grasp how revenue is recognized under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This standard defines a five-step process to ensure accurate and consistent revenue recognition in financial statements. These steps are:Identify the contract with the customer.Identify performance obligations.Determine transaction price.Allocate transaction price to performance obligations.Recognize revenue.Understanding these steps is crucial for businesses, especially as e-commerce continues to redefine how transactions occur in the digital age.Why Revenue Recognition Can Be ChallengingRevenue recognition can become complex, particularly when selling physical goods, and even more so in the online space. Picture this: a customer places an online order, pays through PayPal, returns one of the items a week later, and applies a discount voucher at checkout. From the shopper’s point of view, this is just a normal transaction. But for businesses, each step adds complexity when applying ASC 606’s rule that revenue must be recognized once performance obligations are satisfied.In e-commerce, several factors give rise to recurring challenges in applying revenue recognition, such as:Principal vs Agent ConsiderationsA critical challenge for online marketplaces is determining whether they are acting as a principal (directly providing the goods or services) or as an agent (facilitating the transaction between buyers and third-party sellers).The principal versus agent determination follows a two-step process:Identify the specified good or service to be provided to the end consumer.Assess whether the reporting entity controls the specified good or service before it is transferred to the consumer.A reporting entity is considered the principal in a transaction if it gains control of the specified good or service before it is transferred to the consumer. Conversely, the entity is considered an agent if it does not gain control before the transfer.However, determining whether the reporting entity has obtained control is not always straightforward. ASC 606 provides the following indicators to help management make this assessment:The entity is primarily responsible for delivering and ensuring the acceptability of the good or service.The entity bears inventory risk either before transfer to the customer or after, such as when returns are possible.The entity has the ability to set the price, suggesting control over the good or service.Understanding the distinction between principal and agent is crucial, as it directly affects the amount of revenue recognized. For instance, when acting as a principal, an entity must recognize revenue based on the gross amount of sales. Conversely, when acting as an agent, revenue is limited to the net commission or fee earned.A common area where the principal-versus-agent distinction becomes important is in the treatment of payment processing fees. Many e-commerce businesses rely on third-party intermediaries such as PayPal, Stripe, or credit card companies to process customer transactions. These intermediaries often deduct a service fee before remitting the net balance to the seller.From a cash perspective, this might appear straightforward—the seller simply receives the net proceeds. However, the accounting treatment requires closer evaluation under ASC 606.If the reporting entity is the principal, it must recognize revenue at the gross sales amount by the agent from the customer– this is before deducting the agent’s commission and any related payment processing fees. In most cases, processing fees are recorded separately as an operating expense, not as a direct reduction of revenue.Managing Returns and WarrantiesReturns and warranties make revenue recognition especially tricky in e-commerce. A company may record a sale at the point of purchase, only for the customer to return the product days or weeks later. This timing gap means revenue cannot always be recognized outright — businesses must estimate potential returns and adjust revenue upfront, relying on historical data, current trends, and return patterns.The right of return typically entitles customers to a refund, store credit, or product exchange. To account for this properly, companies must recognize revenue based on the expected consideration, excluding items likely to be returned, and record both a refund liability and a return asset for products expected to come back.Warranties add another layer of complexity. Companies often include them with sales, but the accounting depends on whether the warranty is assurance-type or service-type. An assurance-type warranty provides the customer with the assurance that the product will function in accordance with agreed specifications, and it is accounted for under ASC 460, Guarantees. A service-type warranty offers the customer a service in addition to the assurance that the product will function as specified, and it is accounted for as a separate performance obligation under ASC 606. Knowing the difference is critical, as it affects when and how revenue is recognized.Shipping and Handling ActivitiesShipping and handling services play a crucial role in e-commerce revenue recognition. Businesses that sell goods typically use the services of third-party shipping providers for delivery. In some cases, customers are charged a separate shipping and handling fee, while in others, these costs are embedded in the product price.An entity that promises to transfer goods to a customer may perform shipping and handling activities related to those goods. If these activities occur before the customer gains control of the goods, they are activities to fulfill the entity’s promise to transfer goods. If the activities occur after the customer gains control, the entity can choose to account for them as part of the goods to fulfill the promise to transfer the goods rather than as additional promised services. If such an election is not made, shipping and handling activities are treated as promised services and may be considered additional performance obligations.Companies should carefully review the shipping terms to determine when control of the goods transfers to the customer and whether the shipping services should be treated as a separate performance obligation.Coupons and VouchersCoupons and vouchers are widely used promotional tools in the e-commerce industry to attract new customers and retain existing ones. These promotional tools allow customers to redeem discounts on future purchases or receive free products. Under ASC 606, coupons and vouchers are considered a form of consideration payable to a customer, which encompasses cash, credit, or other similar items that an entity pays, or expects to pay, to a customer. An entity must account for coupons and vouchers as a reduction in the transaction price, and consequently, in the amount of revenue recognized, unless the payment to the customer is in exchange for a distinct good or service that the customer transfers to the entity. The latter is accounted for in the same way as an entity accounts for its other purchases from suppliers. The determination of whether a payment is in exchange for a distinct good or service from a customer is a matter of professional judgment.Customer Loyalty ProgramA customer loyalty program is a marketing strategy that rewards and recognizes customers for their repeat purchases or continued engagement with the company. When customers earn points through this program, a portion of the transaction price is allocated to these points, based on their standalone selling price. Revenue is recognized when the entity has satisfied its performance obligation relating to the points or when the points expire.Bill and Hold ArrangementsBill-and-hold arrangements arise where a customer is billed for goods that are ready for delivery, but the entity does not ship the goods to the customer until a later date. Companies must assess whether control has been transferred to the customer in these cases, even though the customer does not have physical possession of the goods. Revenue is recognized when control of the goods transfers to the customer.For a customer to be considered to have obtained control over the goods in a bill-and-hold arrangement, all of the following criteria must be met:The reason for the bill-and-hold arrangement must be substantive (e.g., the customer has requested the arrangement).The product must be identified separately as belonging to the customer.The product currently must be ready for physical transfer to the customer.The seller cannot have the ability to use the product or to direct it to another customer.How E-Commerce Businesses Can Achieve ASC 606 ComplianceHere are the best practices for ensuring compliance with ASC 606 in the e-commerce industry:Understand Contracts Thoroughly: It’s crucial to fully understand the nature of contracts with customers to appropriately recognize the correct amount of revenue in the proper period.Implement Strong Systems and Controls: Establishing effective systems and controls helps track the satisfaction of performance obligations, manage changes in transaction prices, and ensure compliance with ASC 606 disclosure requirements.Consult with Experts: Consulting with technical accounting professionals can provide valuable insights and help navigate the complexities of revenue recognition to ensure accurate reporting.

Read More >

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.