New Presentation and Disclosure Requirements on Contributed Nonfinancial Assets: Here’s What You Need to Know

Z
Zildjian Torres

Supervisor, Technical Accounting Group

New Presentation and Disclosure Requirements on Contributed Nonfinancial Assets: Here’s What You Need to Know

Contributions are one of the primary sources of funds for any Not-for-Profit Organizations (NPOs) that allow them to run daily operations. Contributions, though, are not limited to cash but take the form of in-kind items such as products or services.


In recent years, the accounting of in-kind contributions has been a cause for concern, with a particular focus on the valuation and disclosures surrounding them. Some instances have been identified where the valuation of in-kind contributions was overstated, leading to an inflated representation of revenue, proceeds, and program expenses, which are critical indicators of an NPO’s size and efficiency. This issue has gained the attention of stakeholders and regulatory bodies, who have demanded more detailed information on the measurement of nonfinancial assets contributed and their usage in the NPO’s programs and activities.


To address this, in June 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced changes to the General Accepted Accounting Principles for documenting and presenting the value of in-kind contributions in the financial statements through the Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2020-07. This ASU enhances the presentation and disclosures for contributions of nonfinancial assets or contributed services to increase credibility and transparency.


ASU 2020-07 applies to any NPO that receives contributions in the form of nonfinancial assets, which includes any products or services. On the other hand, the recognition and measurement of contributed securities and other financial assets are outside the scope of this update as, more often than not, they are readily convertible to cash.


You might also want to visit our Nonprofit Financial Reporting page!


What Are the Changes In Reporting Contributed Nonfinancial Assets or Services?

Historically, NPOs were not required to provide detailed information on the value and use of contributed nonfinancial assets in financial reports. Disclosure requirements are limited to contributed services to which no other specific disclosure requirements for contributed nonfinancial assets were enumerated.


ASU 2020-07 brings the following fundamental changes and additions:


Enhanced Disclosure Requirements

  • A separate line item for contributed nonfinancial assets within the statements of activities.
    NPOs are now required to present contributed nonfinancial assets distinctively and can no longer be presented in the same line item as cash and other financial contributions.
  • Disaggregated disclosures of contributed nonfinancial assets
    A supporting note disclosure must disaggregate the amount of contributed nonfinancial assets to detail its composition per type (i.e., fixed assets, utilities, material, supplies, intangible assets, services, etc.).
    NPOs can determine the appropriate disaggregation level on the types of contributed nonfinancial assets to be disclosed. However, they must apply professional judgment in determining the needs of stakeholders, depending on the NPO’s specific activities.
  • For each category of contributed nonfinancial assets, NPOs need to disclose the following:

  1. Qualitative information about whether the contributed nonfinancial assets were either monetized or used during the reporting period. A description of the programs and activities in which those assets were used should be disclosed.

    Assuming there are no donor-imposed restrictions on the usage or monetization of contributed nonfinancial assets, it is best practice for NPOs to use the asset or the proceeds from the sale of the asset to the program and activities it is intended to be used.
  2. Policy (if any) on monetizing, rather than using, contributed nonfinancial assets.

    Although an NPO may have a policy of monetizing contributed nonfinancial assets, it must consider any donor-imposed restrictions on the usage or disposal of these assets. When monetizing commodities immediately after donation, it should also assess whether it acts as a principal or agent in the transaction to determine proper recognition of gross revenue with the cost of goods sold or only net proceeds.
  3. Description of any donor-imposed restrictions associated with the contributed nonfinancial assets.

    The update requires the disclosures of any donor-imposed restrictions on contributed nonfinancial assets. These restrictions can often affect the valuation as they can impose limitations in using these assets in the best possible scenario (i.e., selling rather than using).
  4. Description of the valuation techniques and inputs used to arrive at a fair value measure at initial recognition.

    Contributed nonfinancial assets are reported at fair value when received. NPOs must follow the guidance of ASC 820-10-50-2(bbb)1, which requires disclosures of valuation techniques, inputs used in fair value measurement, and any changes in either or both of the valuation approach and the valuation technique, including the reasons for the changes.

    ASC820     provides details steps in fair value measurement that NPOs should follow according to the type of contributed nonfinancial assets. It also describes three approaches for determining fair value. An NPO must use fair value techniques consistent with these approaches – market approach, cost approach, or income approach.

    NPOs might find identifying publicly available inputs to fair value measurements challenging. At these times, NPOs must make reasonable, fair value estimates by referring to active market transactions.
    There may be instances where an exact match of contributed nonfinancial assets is not observable in an active market. In these cases, NPOs should make reasonable adjustments to the active market prices to better present the valuation of the contributed nonfinancial asset. NPOs should ensure it uses multiple reference prices and that these references are current, actual, and made in an arms-length transaction under a stable financial condition or economy.
  5. The principal or most advantageous market used to arrive at a fair value measure if it is a market in which an NPO is prohibited by a donor-imposed restriction from selling or using the contributed nonfinancial assets.

    The update defines a “Principal Market” as the market with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, while it refers “Most Advantageous Market” to the market that maximizes the amount that would be received to sell the asset or minimizes the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability, after taking into account transaction costs and transportation costs.
    In the process of valuation, should an NPO uses a principal or most advantageous market in which the NPO is prohibited by a donor-imposed restriction from selling or using the contributed nonfinancial assets, such fact and the details of the market used shall be disclosed.

Also read: 8 Ways to Ensure Your Nonprofit Is Tax Compliant 


How should NPOs implement the update?

To ensure compliance with the new guidance, NPOs that have not yet made the shift should disseminate the requirements to staff, especially those in accounting roles. Further, NPOs should review their contributions intake and tracking procedures to ensure they capture the required information at the level of detail needed, which may include implementing new controls on valuation and disclosures. NPOs can still apply the concept of materiality in complying with the disclosure requirements of the update. Further, NPOs can create new general ledger accounts to monitor each asset per type and valuation approach separately.


As a guide, ASC 958-605-55-70 (V and W) provides illustrative examples of presentation and disclosures for contributed nonfinancial assets.


NPOs are required to effect the changes retrospectively. Thus, comparative information must be revisited, and transition disclosures following ASC 250-10-50-1 must be made.

When Is the Update Effective?

NPOs should apply this amendment for annual periods beginning after June 15, 2021, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after June 15, 2022. NPOs have the option for early adoption.

Contact Our Experts

Scrubbed helps nonprofit organizations navigate complex accounting standards with confidence. Our Technical Accounting team provides expert guidance on accounting for in-kind contributions, ensuring compliance, transparent financial reporting, and a smooth adoption of evolving standards.

CONTACT US
Contact Our Experts

Related Content

Blogs

Data, Cash and Deal Readiness: Finance Lessons for Scaling Technology Companies

Data, Cash and Deal Readiness: Finance Lessons for Scaling Technology Companies

The Technology Spotlight was one of three industry spotlights at The Future Is Fractional 2026, hosted by Scrubbed on September 24, 2026. Anthony John Rogador, Accounting Advisory Services Manager at Scrubbed, spoke with Abdul Wahab Zafar, SVP of Finance at Studycast, who has led M&A integrations and financial systems consolidations at fast-scaling companies. They covered building a single source of truth, rationalizing the tech stack, forecasting usage-based revenue by cohort, managing cash with payment terms, and preparing a back office for M&A. The short version: tie customer, contract and billing data together, hold payment terms firm, and operate as if you might sell tomorrow. Fast-growing technology companies tend to add tools faster than they connect them. Finance ends up consolidating data from systems that don’t agree, forecasting revenue that won’t sit still, and hoping the back office holds up if an acquirer calls. At The Future Is Fractional 2026, a virtual conference hosted by finance and accounting advisory firm Scrubbed on September 24, 2026, Session 4 split into three industry breakouts running at the same time: real estate, nonprofit and technology. In the technology track, Scrubbed Accounting Advisory Services Manager Anthony John Rogador spoke with Abdul Wahab Zafar, SVP of Finance at Studycast, who has run M&A integrations and systems consolidations at fast-scaling companies. Key Takeaways: Accurate financials start upstream. Customer, contract and billing data need a common key tying them together. 90–95% data alignment is often enough. The last last few percent can cost more than it’s worth. Forecast usage-based revenue by cohort . In Zafar's experience, a cohort’s second year grows fastest, then growth settles to low single digits. Protect cash with payment terms. Hold customer terms firm and negotiate longer vendor terms to create a cushion. Operate as if you’ll sell tomorrow. Buyers judge revenue by how well customer, contract and billing data tie out. Don't rush to merge systems after a deal. Move acquired customers into the process that already works. Meet the Speakers Anthony John Rogador (moderator): Accounting Advisory Services Manager, Scrubbed. [LINK: LinkedIn] Abdul Wahab Zafar, MBA, CMA : Senior Vice President of Finance, Studycast, with experience leading M&A integration, financial systems consolidation and scaling finance operations at fast-growing companies .  Building a Single Source of Truth upstream Finance, Zafar said, takes data from everywhere else and consolidates it. So accurate financials start 'on the head of the pipe,' with customer data. He thinks of each data set as a 'cube,' and the order matters: customer first, then contract, then billing, then vendors. Data Set The Question To Answer Customer Data  Who is buying from you, and is that record correct? Contract Data  What exactly did they buy? Billing Does billing reflect the same customer name and contract terms? Vendor Data Who do you pay, under which contracts, against which invoices? When those line up, he said, the financial data naturally becomes accurate and trustworthy. Standardizing data across disconnected systems Growing businesses add the tool they need and forget to connect it. Zafar’s approach: Define the North Star for your data, then break it into the steps needed to get there. Get leadership aligned. If data alignment isn’t a priority for sales or customer teams, finance can only do so much. Create a common hook. Every record in the customer, contract and billing “cubes” should share a key so anyone can trace one customer across all three. Decide whether the last 5% is worth it. Reaching 90–95% alignment is often achievable. The final 5% may require retooling working processes or systems that already work, and in his experience is often less cost-effective than working around it. Rationalizing the tech stack before adding tools New finance tools launch constantly. Zafar’s discipline before buying one Identify the actual problem you’re solving, in depth. Check whether your current systems can solve it . Many companies use only part of what a platform like NetSuite can do. Only then evaluate third-party options, with a clear picture of what you need. Keep it simple. The fix is sometimes the smallest tool on the market and don't create processes 'just to make it look like you're doing a good job.' Complexity has a staffing cost. “If it’s more complicated processes, then a lot of times you need a bigger team to manage those processes,” and most small and mid-sized finance teams run lean. Forecasting Usage-based Revenue by cohort Usage-based revenue billed on how much customers use the product, not a flat fee) shifts with business days, holidays and seasonality. As Zafar put it, 'It's not as simple as, the customer signed a $12,000 contract, my revenue is $1,000 a month.' Studycast groups customers into cohorts by the year they went live, because cohorts tend to behave consistently over time. Cohort Year Typical growth, in Zafar's experience Why Year 1  Partial year Customers go live partway through the year Year 2  Roughly 70% to 100% The first full year of revenue Years 3-4 onward  Around 4–5% a year Growth declines sharply, then settles Forecasting each cohort separately is more reliable than projecting the whole customer base at once. Separating enterprise and small-business customers to handle outliers The outliers at Studycast, single customers growing 100% or more a year, were mostly enterprise customers who went live at one site, then rolled out to others, compounding revenue month after month. The team now forecasts SMB and enterprise customers separately. Finance can’t forecast enterprise accounts alone, he added. Customer success and sales know whether an account is at capacity or has room to expand, which turns the forecast from “just a number on the paper” into a strategic decision. AI in Finance: Faster automation, Higher stakes for Data integrity Zafar sees AI making finance both easier and harder. It already helps automate bank and account reconciliations, reporting and financial decks. But deeper uses, such as combining data points to analyze a customer fully, depend on data that lines up across systems. Without that common hook, “it’s essentially garbage in, garbage out,” and AI may point you the wrong way. His team has also implemented third-party tools that automate accounts receivable (AR) and accounts payable (AP), significantly reducing processing time. They aren't cheap, he said, but they're 'not the Mercedes of the brands.' He spends two to four hours a week learning AI himself and encourages his team to practice and fail with it. “If you don’t do it, you’re gonna get left behind.” Managing Cash Flow with Payment Terms Predictable cash starts with predictable payment terms. “You live and die with your collections.” Net 20 means payment is due 20 days after the invoice date. Customer Terms (receivables) Vendor Terms (payables) Target   Net 20     Net 45, sometimes settling at net 30 How it’s held    Sales can’t change terms without finance approval; about 95% of customers are on net 20 Negotiate everything with vendors Exceptions Mostly larger customers or trades for something else Varies by vendor Support Dedicated people or systems chase late payers AP automation reduces processing time At those terms, collecting at net 20 and paying at net 30 to 45 works out to a cushion of 10 to 25 days. Not every customer pays on time, he acknowledged. The goal is for most (60–70%) to pay promptly and to have people or systems chasing the rest. M&A Due Diligence: Evaluating a Back office Zafar has been on both sides of deals. As the buyer, he starts with the P&L and balance sheet, but he spends most of his time on customer data. He pulls customer, contract and billing data and tries to merge them. If they tie out easily, revenue evaluation is straightforward. If not, the gaps tell him how much to trust the reported revenue. Most of the time the revenue is real, he said; the hard part is pinpointing the contract and customer behind it. As the seller, he makes sure the customer-to-billing chain is as accurate as possible, even if it lives in Excel, so the company can show the strength of its data. Just as important, finance, sales, customer success and the CRO should all tell the same story. Post-acquisition integration: don’t rush the systems The most common trap, Zafar said, is rushing to merge financial systems. The better move is to understand how data flows from customer to contract to billing, then move the acquired customers into your existing process. “If we are acquiring a business, we’re acquiring revenue.” Don’t break a process that works just to force systems together. Before closing, he said, the one thing finance leaders should understand is the target's billing process, from identifying a customer to signing a contract to sending an invoice. Finance is usually more involved before a deal closes, so it can then guide sales and revenue operations on how to bring that data across. Vendor data, by comparison, is 'a pretty easy lift.' M&A readiness checklist, drawn from the session Can every customer be traced across customer, contract and billing records with one common key? Would your customer-to-billing data tie out if a buyer tried to merge it? Do finance, sales, customer success and revenue leadership tell the same story about customers? Are payment terms consistent, and are exceptions approved and documented? Before closing a deal, do you understand the target’s billing process end to end? Rogador’s closing thought: Getting financial systems and data right doesn’t start when the deal shows up. It’s what makes you ready when it does. This session is part of The Future is Fractional 2026. For how deal readiness connects to the wider shift in finance team design, read Own the Core, Access the Rest: What The Future is Fractional (TFIF) 2026 Revealed About How Finance Teams Are Being Rebuilt   what finance leaders are rethinking about talent, AI and team structure.

Read More >
Blogs

Building a Resilient Nonprofit Finance Function When Funding Is Unpredictable

Building a Resilient Nonprofit Finance Function When Funding Is Unpredictable

The Nonprofit Spotlight was one of three industry spotlights at The Future Is Fractional 2026, hosted by Scrubbed on September 24, 2026. Laurence Ruelo, Director of Business Development at Scrubbed, spoke with Costa John of CFO Assignments, who has decades of CFO experience across nonprofit and for-profit organizations. They covered the three pillars of financial resilience, tracking restricted funds, what to do when a major funder pulls out, board reporting, and how to build finance capacity without overbuilding. The short version: watch unrestricted cash, act early and in phases when funding is cut, and give your board the forward look rather than the history. For many nonprofits, the funding hasn’t disappeared, but its timing has become harder to predict. Grants arrive late. Proposals take longer to secure. Visibility six or twelve months out is thin. At The Future Is Fractional 2026, a virtual conference hosted by finance and accounting advisory firm Scrubbed on September 24, 2026, Session 4 split into three industry breakouts running at the same time: real estate, nonprofit and technology. In the nonprofit track, Scrubbed Director of Business Development Laurence Ruelo asked veteran CFO Costa John how nonprofits can build a finance function that is resilient, useful to leadership and scalable when resources are already stretched. Key Takeaways: Resilience rests on three legs: liquidity, flexibility and the cash cycle. Timesheets and integration drive restricted fund tracking. Programs are delivered by people, so staff time is what releases restricted funds. When funding is cut, act early and in phases. The first cost reductions are the cheapest ones. Don't hire strategy to fix bookkeeping. Get the books closing cleanly before bringing in a fractional CFO, or the CFO gets pulled back into reconciliations. Give boards the forward look, not the history. Show the outlook, its impact and a range of decisions. Watch operating cash flow, and show days of cash. “Reserves and profits are a matter of opinion. Cash is a matter of fact.” What is nonprofit financial resilience? It’s an organization’s ability to keep delivering its mission when funding is delayed, reduced or withdrawn. In John’s framing, that depends on having unrestricted funds(money not tied to a specific grant or purpose) available, enough cash on hand to absorb delays and a clear view of how long the organization must pay its costs before funding arrives. Meet the Speakers Laurence Ruelo ( moderator): Director of Business Development, Scrubbed. Costa John : CEO CFO Assignments, with decades of CFO experience across nonprofit and for-profit organizations, including as CFO of Sapiens North America.  The Three Pillars of Nonprofit Financial Resilience John frames resilience as a three-legged stool: Liquidity: The level of unrestricted funds the organization can draw on. Flexibility : The cushion to absorb a delayed grant or a slow proposal. The board usually sets it with the CFO as a target number of months of cash operating expenses. The cash cycle: How many days the organization must cover rent, salaries, travel and office costs before funding arrives. Together, they give the organization a stable footing. John acknowledged it’s hard for small nonprofits, but said building toward it should be a priority. How to Track Restricted Funds without the Spreadsheet Wrestling Match Restricted funds are grants or donations that can be spent only on a specific purpose or program. Start with timesheets. Nonprofit programs are delivered by people, so releasing restricted funds and matching expenses to grants comes down to how staff time is spent. “If you cannot have a good on-hand grip of where and how your program people are delivering against the mission, you’re already on a slippery slope." Integrate the systems. The more the organization’s systems connect end to end, the less restricted revenue tracking becomes “a wrestling match between confusing and sometimes broken spreadsheets.” Affordable, easier-to-integrate software has made that more realistic than it used to be. Contingency planning when a major funder pulls out Stay close to funders. Organizations with strong funder relationships can often see cuts coming, whether funders planned them or are reacting to their own budget pressures. Have the outline of a plan ready. John described a phased response, from least to most disruptive: Delay contractors and capital spending not required this year. Delay replacements when people resign. Delay salary increases. Delay benefits such as 401(k) matches. Only if those steps don’t buy enough time, consider reductions in force. Act early. Once you know funding is going away, move. “Your first cost reduction steps are ironically your cheapest ones.” Hesitating can make the eventual response more painful and more expensive. Board Reporting: Forward-looking Information, Not just data “Data is not the same as information,” John said. Boards can drown in numbers. He recommended spending little time on historical statements beyond a status update. “It’s hard asking a board to govern an organization looking in the rearview mirror.” Include in Board Updates What It Means The forward look The outlook for the coming period The impact If this happens, here's what it means financially Decisions,plural A range of choices and their impacts, not a single option to approve or reject Non-financial metrics, with the CFO at the table John pushed back on the idea that non-financial metrics are outside the CFO’s lane. Measures like schools reached, children served or outcomes achieved all have financial drivers underneath, and the CFO can help program leaders see the dollar value of their impact. He sees a missed opportunity with funders: payback . In one illustration, a program costing about $72,000 per school produces an estimated $112,000 per school in lifetime health and education benefits. Framed that way, funders hear two things: the program pays for itself, and more money would do more good. Aligning boards on cash reserves Reserves aren’t shareholders’ equity. John warned that board members without a finance background shouldn't read nonprofit reserves that way. Restricted reserves reported under GAAP are, in economic substance, obligations to deliver future programs, and the cash to deliver them needs to be available. Deficits change the math. With $10 million in grant revenue and $12 million in expenses, every dollar of programming costs $1.20. Delivering more of it without a plan to close the gap can dig the hole deeper, so healthy-looking reserves can offer “a comfort that turns out to be razor thin.” Boards don’t need the calculations, he said, but they should know to ask. Scaling Finance Capacity: Compliance vs. Value-added work Executive directors already juggle fundraising, programs, people and operations. John divides finance into two parts, with different ways to resource each: Non-negotiable: compliance and reporting Value-added: strategy and planning What it covers The Form 990, the audit, paying vendors, payroll Forecasting, budgeting, support at the fundraising and budget tables The risk It “can become a self-consuming monster” without integration and automation It gets crowded out if the CFO is pulled into bookkeeping How John would resource it Outsource it, or at minimum keep it separate from the CFO role A part-time or fractional CFO, kept out of the bookkeeping weeds Don’t hire strategy to fix bookkeeping. Bringing in a fractional CFO for strategic work while the books still don’t close cleanly means the CFO gets dragged back into reconciliations, “the most expensive way to solve the wrong problem.” Messy reconciliations also pull program leaders away from the mission. Start with the lightest system that works . John warned against buying the most sophisticated accounting system too early. A lightweight option such as QuickBooks with nonprofit modules usually serves growing organizations better, while complex systems can “grind the process to a halt.” Ruelo agreed, noting organizations that implement complex systems, don’t get the information they need and end up returning to simpler tools. Non-financial metrics, with the CFO at the table A dedicated CFO role, even a part-time or fractional one, onshore or offshore, kept out of the bookkeeping weeds . Relationship-driven roles such as the grant accountant, who knows program leaders, funders and nuances that may not translate if outsourced. The metric every Nonprofit leader should watch: Operating cash flow “Reserves and profits are a matter of opinion. Cash is a matter of fact.” A balance sheet can look healthy while cash is tied up in grants not yet funded, and “you cannot make payroll with grant certificates or invoices.” John recommended practicing short-horizon cash forecasting, starting at 30 and 60 days, until it becomes muscle memory, especially as the funding environment for nonprofits shifts. One Change to the Board packet: An Unrestricted Cash Schedule What to cut: Liability-side schedules, such as an accounts payable aging report showing how long vendors have waited to be paid. John called that too operational to help a board make a decision. What to add: a schedule showing how many days the organization can run on unrestricted cash. Start with unrestricted reserves. Subtract amounts already committed. Divide by daily cash expenses. The board then knows, at every meeting, how many days the organization can operate: 111 days, say, or 192. It's easy to focus on and easy to understand. Ruelo’s summary of the conversation:   Resilience starts with visibility, good reporting translates information into decisions, and finance capacity is about access to the right expertise at the right time, whether internal, fractional, outsourced or a mix. This session is part of The Future is Fractional 2026. For the themes that ran across every industry, read Own the Core, Access the Rest: What The Future is Fractional (TFIF) 2026 Revealed About How Finance Teams Are Being Rebuilt   what finance leaders are rethinking about talent, AI and team structure.

Read More >
Blogs

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

For growing pass-through entities, the September 15 tax deadline often creates a collision between cash flow and internal capacity. Guessing at estimated payments leaves companies vulnerable to IRS penalties or unnecessarily traps critical working capital meant for Q4 growth. By establishing a Safe Harbor floor and utilizing the Annualized Income Installment Method, companies can align tax outlays directly with actual revenue. When this execution is handled proactively, finance leaders stop playing defense against deadlines and reclaim their time for strategic planning. When a high-growth pass-through entity, such as an S-Corp or a Partnership, comes off an unexpectedly strong summer, revenue is up. This should be a moment for leadership to celebrate and plan their Q4 investments. Instead, the internal finance team often finds themselves staring down a cash crunch they didn't anticipate. The pressure point is September 15. For growing operations, this date is often a collision course. It is not only the deadline for Q3 estimated tax payments, but it is also the extended filing deadline for Forms 1065 and 1120-S . When you have an internal team trying to finalize the previous year's historical data while simultaneously projecting the current year's performance, the structure usually begins to strain. This isn't about a team dropping the ball. It's simply what happens when internal workflows haven't scaled up to match a company's growth. When two major deadlines collide, and the volume is too high, a stretched team has no choice but to improvise. The Cost of "Guesstimating" In a pass-through entity, the business itself generally does not pay federal income tax. Because income from partnerships and S corporations generally passes through to their owners, owners may need to make individual estimated tax payments based in part on their share of the entity’s taxable income When internal teams don't have a dedicated workflow for this, they often get bogged down trying to predict exact year-end profits during a busy quarter. Without a clear mechanism to manage this, I frequently see companies do one of two things: they either underpay and leave themselves vulnerable to IRS penalties, or they overpay to "be safe." Overpaying might feel like the responsible choice in the moment, but it unnecessarily ties up working capital. When these distributions are sized off gross revenue rather than a projection that accounts for deductions or state-level elections, the company pulls more cash out of the operating account than the owners actually owe. That excess traps liquidity that could have been used to fund critical Q4 growth initiatives—like a marketing push or inventory expansion—without seeking outside financing. Establishing an Estimated-Tax Safe Harbor  When our tax professionals step in to manage this process, the very first thing we do is establish a predictable foundation. We immediately build a "Tax Compliance Calendar" integrated with a "Safe Harbor Floor." A useful starting point is determining which estimated-tax safe harbor applies. For many taxpayers, one option is to base required annual payments on 100% of the prior year's tax, increasing to 110% for certain higher-income taxpayers. The current-year 90% test may also apply. Meeting the applicable requirements through timely payments can generally reduce exposure to estimated-tax underpayment penalties. Once that floor is established, we can adjust for the reality of the current year. Aligning Outlays with Actual Cash Flow If a company sees a massive spike in revenue during Q3, the standard installment method might demand a payment that creates a sudden cash flow imbalance. Good intentions won't balance the cash flow at this stage; you need a precise mathematical approach. To stabilize cash flow during a sudden revenue surge, one strategy to consider is the Annualized Income Installment Method . Instead of assuming income is earned evenly throughout the year, the Annualized Income Installment Method determines the owner's required installments based more closely on income earned during the applicable annualization periods State-level PTE tax elections may also provide federal tax benefits by allowing qualifying state income taxes to be paid and deducted at the entity level rather than being subject to the individual SALT deduction limitation. The result? Depending on the state's PTE tax regime, entity-level payments may reduce the state estimated-tax payments otherwise required from individual owners. A deductible PTE tax payment may also reduce the taxable income passed through to owners for federal purposes, which can affect their projected federal estimated-tax liability. Restoring Strategic Headspace When tax planning is handled consistently throughout the year, it changes how a leadership team operates. It can significantly reduce the risk of an "April Surprise." When Q3 estimates are calculated accurately and tied to a deliberate strategy, leadership knows exactly how much capital is truly theirs to spend. Tax shifts from a looming, unpredictable liability into a manageable line item. Just as importantly, the internal finance leader gets their time back. Instead of spending the first two weeks of September finalizing and issuing K-1s, calculating thresholds, and worrying about penalties, they can focus on high-level financial modeling and operational efficiency. A strong tax partner doesn't just run the numbers; they take the friction out of the process so your team can focus forward. When an experienced team handles the heavy lifting behind the scenes, you stop playing defense against IRS deadlines and start using tax strategy as a genuine tool to fund your growth. See how our tax professionals support growing operations and keep execution predictable. Let's talk through how we can support your finance function. Comparing Q3 Tax Strategies: Safe Harbor vs. Annualized Method vs. PTE Strategy Ideal for Primary Benefit Risk Level  100%/110% Safe Harbor  Rapidly growing companies  Provides protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied  Low (May temporarily tie up cash if revenue drops)  Annualized Method  Seasonal or late-year spiking revenue Align tax outlays directly with timing of taxable income  Moderate (Requires meticulous record-keeping) PTE Tax Election Entities in high-tax states May provide an entity-level federal deduction for qualifying state income taxes while providing state tax benefits to eligible owners Low (Requires state-specific eligibility and election compliance) Key Takeaways: The Deadline Collision: The simultaneous timing of Q3 estimates and extended historical filings places severe strain on internal finance teams when workflows haven't scaled. The Cost of "Guesstimating": Overpaying estimated taxes based on gross revenue ties up liquidity that could otherwise fund critical Q4 growth initiatives without requiring outside financing. Building a Safe Harbor Floor: Establishing a baseline payment based on 100% or 110% of the prior year's tax liability can provide protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when the applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied. Aligning Cash Flow: The Annualized Income Installment Method stabilizes cash positions by calculating tax based on income earned during the applicable annualization periods rather than an arbitrary quarterly fraction. Restoring Strategic Headspace: When tax planning is handled reliably behind the scenes, internal finance leaders get their time back to focus on high-level financial modeling instead of chasing K-1s.

Read More >

Links

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.