What KPIs early-stage companies should be hyper-focused on

Scrubbed

Scrubbed

What KPIs early-stage companies should be hyper-focused on


If you have recently started a business – and secured at least an initial round of funding – you are not alone. In fact, according to data from the Census Bureau, entrepreneurial activity has skyrocketed during the pandemic with Americans starting 4.3 million businesses in 2020 and 5.4 million in 2021. This is the largest number of startups recorded in the 15 years that the government has tracked this activity.  

While starting a business is an accomplishment itself, growing it is often much harder than many entrepreneurs expect. In fact, approximately 80% of new businesses fail to make it to their fifth year. Even with the most innovative idea and best business plan, it is vitally important to understand and regularly check the financial health of your business. Have you forecasted your monthly income and are you bringing in that amount, or more? Do you have sufficient cash flow to comfortably pay your employees and bills, or are your accounts receivable piling up? Do you have enough money in reserves to handle unexpected curveballs? 

This is where consistent bookkeeping and analyzing key performance indicators (KPIs) comes in. Setting up an accounting software like Quickbooks Online or Xero can streamline your daily bookkeeping and accounting processes. This is a great place to start, but it is just the beginning of properly managing your company’s financials. At least as important, if not more, is measuring the overall financial health of your business by regularly reviewing KPIs to see the big picture and get a detailed analysis of where you are at any given time. 

Different than metrics, which measure the overall health of a business, KPIs measure your progress toward specific goals. Both are important, but it is your KPIs that will help you determine if you are meeting your objectives and let you know when you need to adjust your plan. The KPIs you should review depend on the type of business, but below we have described what a few early stage companies should set up and review on a routine basis. 

Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) = Total Cost of Customer Acquisition / Number of Customers Acquired


This is the average cost of acquiring a customer and includes activities like manufacturing and distribution (for product companies) and marketing. Often CAC is further broken out into Blended CAC and Paid CAC. Blended CAC looks at the total number of customers you acquired, even those that came through free sources like word of mouth. Paid CAC counts only those customers acquired with paid channels like placing an ad on Facebook or Google. It is important to look at both so you can understand how effective your marketing efforts are and if that money should be spent in other ways.  When using a CAC value, the target is to ensure the CAC is lower than the average order. Since it is a measure of how much it costs to acquire each customer, you want to ensure each customer spends more in the company than you spent acquiring them. CAC is most helpful when it is combined with other measures. 

Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) = Monthly Recurring Revenue / Total Active Customers

ARPU allows you to understand how much revenue you are generating from each active customer. Companies with a higher ARPU will have more cash on hand to spend on marketing activities, where those with lower ARPU may need to look at ways to upsell current customers, increase their prices, or decrease their costs.

Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) = Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) * Average Margin Per User (AMPU) / Revenue Churn Rate (RCR)


 
Getting a bit more complicated, your LTV is an estimate of how much money an average customer will spend with your company during their lifetime. This number helps you understand if the amount you are spending to acquire a customer is sustainable and allows you to make informed decisions on ways to improve retention, reduce customer acquisition cost, and increase the revenue generated from each customer. Looking at the LTV:CAC ratio compares the cost of acquiring customers to their lifetime value. For any recurring revenue business, a 3:1 ratio is usually a good target. This means that the value of each customer is three times the cost of acquiring them. 

Customer Churn Rate (CCR) = Number of Customers Lost / Total Customers

 
As the name indicates, this is a measure of how many customers you are losing over a period of time. There will always be attrition, but if this number starts to grow, you will know something is happening that is causing customers to leave at a faster rate than they were before. Did you make a change that customers don’t like? Has your level of customer service dropped? Did you make a change in your products that customers don’t like? It is important to evaluate your customer satisfaction scores and complaints to get to the bottom of the issue. You can also break CCR down by other factors like customer segments, length of customer relationship, features/pricing, etc. so you can make changes to the areas at issue and stem the flow of customers. For a recurring revenue business like a SAAS business, churn should average about 5% and never exceed 10%. 

Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) = Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) * Monthly Active Users (MAU)

 
This is simply the amount of revenue your company is bringing in each month allowing you to track your company’s financial situation and how much money you can expect to have on hand to pay expenses. You can further break down your MRR to New MRR or the revenue earned from new customers added in a time period, Churn MRR or what you have lost in revenue due to customer churn, or Expansion MRR or additional revenue generated by your current customers spending more money with your business. These metrics are often analyzed as part of broader corporate finance advisory strategies and real estate accounting solutions designed to support growth and profitability.

Revenue Growth Rate = (Current Period Revenue – Previous Period Revenue) / Previous Period Revenue * 100

 

While the math on this one gets a bit more complicated, what it shows you is simple: how much you are growing your revenue over a month, quarter, year, or whatever period you choose to measure. This shows you how profitable you are in one period over a previous one, and ultimately indicates the sustainability of your business model. Knowing this information will help you determine the best way to allocate resources. Companies in high growth mode that are considering going public should be trending above 20% revenue growth each year.

Gross Burn Rate = Cash / Monthly Operating Expenses

 

This is simply a measure of a company’s operating expenses and is typically measured monthly. It indicates how quickly a company will go through its startup capital before becoming cash flow positive. Venture capitalists will often use a company’s burn rate as a measurement of whether they see it as a good investment. A low burn rate indicates that investment dollars will go further, and the company is poised to gain traction and become profitable more quickly. A high burn rate means that a business is depleting its cash supply quickly and needs to decrease expenses, increase funding, or both. 

Cash Runway = Current Cash Balance / Burn Rate

 

Once you know your burn rate, you can determine your cash runway or how long you can continue to operate at the current rate before running out of money. This can help business leaders make decisions about how to reduce costs, when to secure additional funding, and a variety of other important decisions. While these are a few of the KPIs startups can measure, there are many others to consider. The ones you should review regularly depend greatly on the type of business you have, how you are funded, how quickly you want to grow, etc. 


Don’t be overwhelmed with the options. Scrubbed can help create and review the KPIs that will be most important to your company so you can make informed business decisions. If you have questions or would like our input, don’t hesitate to reach out for a consultation. We would love to be part of your team and help you realize your entrepreneurial dream.


If you have recently started a business – and secured at least an initial round of funding – you are not alone. In fact, according to data from the Census Bureau, entrepreneurial activity has skyrocketed during the pandemic with Americans starting 4.3 million businesses in 2020 and 5.4 million in 2021. This is the largest number of startups recorded in the 15 years that the government has tracked this activity.  


While starting a business is an accomplishment itself, growing it is often much harder than many entrepreneurs expect. In fact, approximately 80% of new businesses fail to make it to their fifth year. Even with the most innovative idea and best business plan, it is vitally important to understand and regularly check the financial health of your business. Have you forecasted your monthly income and are you bringing in that amount, or more? Do you have sufficient cash flow to comfortably pay your employees and bills, or are your accounts receivable piling up? Do you have enough money in reserves to handle unexpected curveballs? 


This is where consistent bookkeeping and analyzing key performance indicators (KPIs) comes in. Setting up an accounting software like Quickbooks Online or Xero can streamline your daily bookkeeping and accounting processes. This is a great place to start, but it is just the beginning of properly managing your company’s financials. At least as important, if not more, is measuring the overall financial health of your business by regularly reviewing KPIs to see the big picture and get a detailed analysis of where you are at any given time. 


Different than metrics, which measure the overall health of a business, KPIs measure your progress toward specific goals. Both are important, but it is your KPIs that will help you determine if you are meeting your objectives and let you know when you need to adjust your plan. The KPIs you should review depend on the type of business, but below we have described what a few early stage companies should set up and review on a routine basis. 


Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) = Total Cost of Customer Acquisition / Number of Customers Acquired

 

This is the average cost of acquiring a customer and includes activities like manufacturing and distribution (for product companies) and marketing. Often CAC is further broken out into Blended CAC and Paid CAC. Blended CAC looks at the total number of customers you acquired, even those that came through free sources like word of mouth. Paid CAC counts only those customers acquired with paid channels like placing an ad on Facebook or Google. It is important to look at both so you can understand how effective your marketing efforts are and if that money should be spent in other ways.  When using a CAC value, the target is to ensure the CAC is lower than the average order. Since it is a measure of how much it costs to acquire each customer, you want to ensure each customer spends more in the company than you spent acquiring them. CAC is most helpful when it is combined with other measures. 

Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) = Monthly Recurring Revenue / Total Active CustomersARPU allows you to understand how much revenue you are generating from each active customer. Companies with a higher ARPU will have more cash on hand to spend on marketing activities, where those with lower ARPU may need to look at ways to upsell current customers, increase their prices, or decrease their costs.

Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) = Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) * Average Margin Per User (AMPU) / Revenue Churn Rate (RCR)
 


Getting a bit more complicated, your LTV is an estimate of how much money an average customer will spend with your company during their lifetime. This number helps you understand if the amount you are spending to acquire a customer is sustainable and allows you to make informed decisions on ways to improve retention, reduce customer acquisition cost, and increase the revenue generated from each customer. Looking at the LTV:CAC ratio compares the cost of acquiring customers to their lifetime value. For any recurring revenue business, a 3:1 ratio is usually a good target. This means that the value of each customer is three times the cost of acquiring them. 

Customer Churn Rate (CCR) = Number of Customers Lost / Total Customers

 

As the name indicates, this is a measure of how many customers you are losing over a period of time. There will always be attrition, but if this number starts to grow, you will know something is happening that is causing customers to leave at a faster rate than they were before. Did you make a change that customers don’t like? Has your level of customer service dropped? Did you make a change in your products that customers don’t like? It is important to evaluate your customer satisfaction scores and complaints to get to the bottom of the issue. You can also break CCR down by other factors like customer segments, length of customer relationship, features/pricing, etc. so you can make changes to the areas at issue and stem the flow of customers. For a recurring revenue business like a SAAS business, churn should average about 5% and never exceed 10%. 

Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) = Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) * Monthly Active Users (MAU)

 
This is simply the amount of revenue your company is bringing in each month allowing you to track your company’s financial situation and how much money you can expect to have on hand to pay expenses. You can further break down your MRR to New MRR or the revenue earned from new customers added in a time period, Churn MRR or what you have lost in revenue due to customer churn, or Expansion MRR or additional revenue generated by your current customers spending more money with your business. 

Revenue Growth Rate = (Current Period Revenue – Previous Period Revenue) / Previous Period Revenue * 100

 
While the math on this one gets a bit more complicated, what it shows you is simple: how much you are growing your revenue over a month, quarter, year, or whatever period you choose to measure. This shows you how profitable you are in one period over a previous one, and ultimately indicates the sustainability of your business model. Knowing this information will help you determine the best way to allocate resources. Companies in high growth mode that are considering going public should be trending above 20% revenue growth each year.

Gross Burn Rate = Cash / Monthly Operating Expenses

 
This is simply a measure of a company’s operating expenses and is typically measured monthly. It indicates how quickly a company will go through its startup capital before becoming cash flow positive. Venture capitalists will often use a company’s burn rate as a measurement of whether they see it as a good investment. A low burn rate indicates that investment dollars will go further, and the company is poised to gain traction and become profitable more quickly. A high burn rate means that a business is depleting its cash supply quickly and needs to decrease expenses, increase funding, or both. 

Cash Runway = Current Cash Balance / Burn Rate



Once you know your burn rate, you can determine your cash runway or how long you can continue to operate at the current rate before running out of money. This can help business leaders make decisions about how to reduce costs, when to secure additional funding, and a variety of other important decisions.While these are a few of the KPIs startups can measure, there are many others to consider. The ones you should review regularly depend greatly on the type of business you have, how you are funded, how quickly you want to grow, etc. 

Don’t be overwhelmed with the options. Scrubbed can help create and review the KPIs that will be most important to your company so you can make informed business decisions. If you have questions or would like our input, don’t hesitate to reach out for a consultation. We would love to be part of your team and help you realize your entrepreneurial dream.

Related Content

Blogs

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

For growing pass-through entities, the September 15 tax deadline often creates a collision between cash flow and internal capacity. Guessing at estimated payments leaves companies vulnerable to IRS penalties or unnecessarily traps critical working capital meant for Q4 growth. By establishing a Safe Harbor floor and utilizing the Annualized Income Installment Method, companies can align tax outlays directly with actual revenue. When this execution is handled proactively, finance leaders stop playing defense against deadlines and reclaim their time for strategic planning. When a high-growth pass-through entity, such as an S-Corp or a Partnership, comes off an unexpectedly strong summer, revenue is up. This should be a moment for leadership to celebrate and plan their Q4 investments. Instead, the internal finance team often finds themselves staring down a cash crunch they didn't anticipate. The pressure point is September 15. For growing operations, this date is often a collision course. It is not only the deadline for Q3 estimated tax payments, but it is also the extended filing deadline for Forms 1065 and 1120-S . When you have an internal team trying to finalize the previous year's historical data while simultaneously projecting the current year's performance, the structure usually begins to strain. This isn't about a team dropping the ball. It's simply what happens when internal workflows haven't scaled up to match a company's growth. When two major deadlines collide, and the volume is too high, a stretched team has no choice but to improvise. The Cost of "Guesstimating" In a pass-through entity, the business itself generally does not pay federal income tax. Because income from partnerships and S corporations generally passes through to their owners, owners may need to make individual estimated tax payments based in part on their share of the entity’s taxable income When internal teams don't have a dedicated workflow for this, they often get bogged down trying to predict exact year-end profits during a busy quarter. Without a clear mechanism to manage this, I frequently see companies do one of two things: they either underpay and leave themselves vulnerable to IRS penalties, or they overpay to "be safe." Overpaying might feel like the responsible choice in the moment, but it unnecessarily ties up working capital. When these distributions are sized off gross revenue rather than a projection that accounts for deductions or state-level elections, the company pulls more cash out of the operating account than the owners actually owe. That excess traps liquidity that could have been used to fund critical Q4 growth initiatives—like a marketing push or inventory expansion—without seeking outside financing. Establishing an Estimated-Tax Safe Harbor  When our tax professionals step in to manage this process, the very first thing we do is establish a predictable foundation. We immediately build a "Tax Compliance Calendar" integrated with a "Safe Harbor Floor." A useful starting point is determining which estimated-tax safe harbor applies. For many taxpayers, one option is to base required annual payments on 100% of the prior year's tax, increasing to 110% for certain higher-income taxpayers. The current-year 90% test may also apply. Meeting the applicable requirements through timely payments can generally reduce exposure to estimated-tax underpayment penalties. Once that floor is established, we can adjust for the reality of the current year. Aligning Outlays with Actual Cash Flow If a company sees a massive spike in revenue during Q3, the standard installment method might demand a payment that creates a sudden cash flow imbalance. Good intentions won't balance the cash flow at this stage; you need a precise mathematical approach. To stabilize cash flow during a sudden revenue surge, one strategy to consider is the Annualized Income Installment Method . Instead of assuming income is earned evenly throughout the year, the Annualized Income Installment Method determines the owner's required installments based more closely on income earned during the applicable annualization periods State-level PTE tax elections may also provide federal tax benefits by allowing qualifying state income taxes to be paid and deducted at the entity level rather than being subject to the individual SALT deduction limitation. The result? Depending on the state's PTE tax regime, entity-level payments may reduce the state estimated-tax payments otherwise required from individual owners. A deductible PTE tax payment may also reduce the taxable income passed through to owners for federal purposes, which can affect their projected federal estimated-tax liability. Restoring Strategic Headspace When tax planning is handled consistently throughout the year, it changes how a leadership team operates. It can significantly reduce the risk of an "April Surprise." When Q3 estimates are calculated accurately and tied to a deliberate strategy, leadership knows exactly how much capital is truly theirs to spend. Tax shifts from a looming, unpredictable liability into a manageable line item. Just as importantly, the internal finance leader gets their time back. Instead of spending the first two weeks of September finalizing and issuing K-1s, calculating thresholds, and worrying about penalties, they can focus on high-level financial modeling and operational efficiency. A strong tax partner doesn't just run the numbers; they take the friction out of the process so your team can focus forward. When an experienced team handles the heavy lifting behind the scenes, you stop playing defense against IRS deadlines and start using tax strategy as a genuine tool to fund your growth. See how our tax professionals support growing operations and keep execution predictable. Let's talk through how we can support your finance function. Comparing Q3 Tax Strategies: Safe Harbor vs. Annualized Method vs. PTE Strategy Ideal for Primary Benefit Risk Level  100%/110% Safe Harbor  Rapidly growing companies  Provides protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied  Low (May temporarily tie up cash if revenue drops)  Annualized Method  Seasonal or late-year spiking revenue Align tax outlays directly with timing of taxable income  Moderate (Requires meticulous record-keeping) PTE Tax Election Entities in high-tax states May provide an entity-level federal deduction for qualifying state income taxes while providing state tax benefits to eligible owners Low (Requires state-specific eligibility and election compliance) Key Takeaways: The Deadline Collision: The simultaneous timing of Q3 estimates and extended historical filings places severe strain on internal finance teams when workflows haven't scaled. The Cost of "Guesstimating": Overpaying estimated taxes based on gross revenue ties up liquidity that could otherwise fund critical Q4 growth initiatives without requiring outside financing. Building a Safe Harbor Floor: Establishing a baseline payment based on 100% or 110% of the prior year's tax liability can provide protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when the applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied. Aligning Cash Flow: The Annualized Income Installment Method stabilizes cash positions by calculating tax based on income earned during the applicable annualization periods rather than an arbitrary quarterly fraction. Restoring Strategic Headspace: When tax planning is handled reliably behind the scenes, internal finance leaders get their time back to focus on high-level financial modeling instead of chasing K-1s.

Read More >
Blogs

Decoding the Digital Ledger: Navigating FASB’s New Standards for Crypto Assets and Intangibles (ASU 2023-08)

Decoding the Digital Ledger: Navigating FASB’s New Standards for Crypto Assets and Intangibles (ASU 2023-08)

In a groundbreaking move reflecting the swift evolution of the financial landscape, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has taken a significant step with the release of the final Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-08 titled “Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets.” This authoritative guidance specifically addresses Crypto Assets within the Intangibles—Goodwill and Other category, marking a crucial advance in establishing standardized accounting practices for these assets. Bridging the Gap: A Brief Background The rise of digital assets, from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum to unique non-fungible tokens (NFTs), has challenged traditional accounting norms. Without specific Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) guidance, accounting professionals relied on analogies and interpretations, resulting in a diverse patchwork of practices.  Our article “Rise of Digital Assets in Business” explored the evolving landscape, highlighting the AICPA Practice Aid titled “Accounting for and Auditing of Digital Assets” as a crucial guide within the constraints of the existing accounting framework. We are witnessing a groundbreaking shift with the finalized FASB’s ASU on Crypto Assets, effective December 15, 2024, which will change how the world sees crypto assets. Who Will Be Affected? The new ASU applies to a wider range of entities than you might think. Any entity holding crypto assets that meet specific criteria will be impacted. These criteria include: Meet the definition of an intangible asset. Do not grant enforceable rights or claims on underlying goods, services, or assets. Exist on a blockchain-based distributed ledger or similar technology. Are secured using cryptography. Are fungible. Are not created or issued by the reporting entity or its related parties. Crypto assets falling within these criteria must be measured at fair value, with changes in value recognized in their income statement each reporting period. Moreover, transaction costs incurred in acquiring these assets, such as commissions and related fees, will be expensed unless other industry-specific guidance dictates otherwise. A Closer Look at the New ASU  Mandating Relevance: Fair Value Measurement  The update mandates the fair value measurement of crypto assets at each reporting period. This focus on fair value measurement stems from the belief that fair value offers investors more relevant information about the assets’ sale value and changes in that value. The Board rejected historical cost and net realizable value as alternatives due to limitations in reflecting downward and upward price movements. The existing guidance in Topic 820 was deemed sufficient for fair value measurement, given its applicability to other assets and current use by reporting entities. As financial reporting evolves, organizations offering ESG reporting services may also need to consider how such valuation updates intersect with broader transparency and sustainability disclosure requirements. Beyond Annual Assessment: Recognizing Both Gains and Losses Unlike the existing ASC 350 model, which mandates an annual assessment of crypto asset value that only recognizes gains upon sale, the update embraces a more dynamic approach. The new method captures both negative and positive market movements, addressing longstanding concerns about the traditional model’s failure to reflect the true and current economic nature of crypto assets at each reporting period. As well as providing a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying economics and an entity’s financial position, the shift signifies a progressive step toward a more responsive and accurate representation of the financial impact of market fluctuations on digital holdings. Enhancing Transparency: Disclosure Requirements The ASU prioritizes transparency, incorporating detailed disclosure requirements for asset categorization, impairment considerations, and, notably, the separate presentation of crypto assets from other intangible assets in the statement of financial position. Entities must disclose the following for annual and interim reporting periods: 1. Details of significant and less significant crypto asset holdings, including name, cost basis, fair value, and quantity. 2. Information on restricted crypto assets, covering fair value, nature, the remaining duration of restrictions, and circumstances for the potential lapse. For annual reporting periods, additional disclosures are required: 1. A roll forward of crypto asset activity, including additions, dispositions, gains, and losses. Specify the income statement line item for unrecognized gains and losses if not presented separately. 2. Detail dispositions of crypto assets, including sale price, cost basis difference, and relevant activities. 3. The method used to determine the cost basis of crypto assets. These changes enhance transparency and understanding of crypto asset holdings, ensuring comprehensive disclosure for annual and interim reporting periods. Nevertheless, entities immediately converting crypto assets received as noncash consideration or contributions into cash are exempt from the above annual additional disclosures. The Countdown Begins: Timeline and Adoption The final standard takes effect for all entities in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2024, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, allowing entities to embrace the changes ahead of the mandated timeline. However, early adopters must use a modified retrospective approach, requiring recording a cumulative effect adjustment to equity (or net assets) from the commencement of the adoption year. What Lies Ahead: Implications for the Future The issuance of the finalized ASU 2023-08 represents a proactive response to the growing significance of crypto assets in today’s financial landscape. The finalized ASU is a significant milestone in our journey toward a standardized and transparent future for crypto asset accounting, offering consistency in financial reporting across diverse industries engaged with crypto assets. The FASB’s move acknowledges the need for accounting standards that keep pace with technological advancements and reflect the realities of the modern economy. Stay tuned for further developments. How Scrubbed Can Help You? Navigating the opportunities and challenges of crypto assets demands expertise, whether you’re an individual investor or a business. At Scrubbed, our comprehensive range of services empowers you to stay ahead: • Compliance Experts: Navigate crypto regulations effortlessly with our seasoned professionals. From taxes to reporting, we’ve got your compliance needs covered. • Rock-Solid Controls: Establish secure systems and ensure compliance with the latest financial reporting standards like GAAP and IFRS. • Innovative Strategies: Beyond the numbers, we offer strategic insights about market tren ds and help you make wise decisions. As we collectively pioneer a new era of financial reporting, Scrubbed is committed to bridging the gap between traditional accounting norms and the groundbreaking shifts introduced by the FASB on Crypto Assets. Our Technical Accounting Group is ready to assist your business in decoding the digital ledger, ensuring effective operations, and maintaining compliance with evolving regulations. We also provide specialized biotech accounting services, supporting organizations in highly regulated industries with tailored financial reporting solutions. For a comprehensive consultancy assessment tailored to your specific needs, reach out to [email protected].

Read More >
Blogs

The ESG Translation Gap: Why Good Accounting Data Fails Sustainability Audits

The ESG Translation Gap: Why Good Accounting Data Fails Sustainability Audits

If I had to name the first common mistake I see growing companies make when they tackle ESG reporting, it is foundational: They don’t know if the data they are using is complete and accurate. More than that, they often don’t even know if it is the data they should be using. For years, ESG reporting was largely voluntary, a way to answer the public’s demand for accountability and show investors you were responsible. But as optional guidelines transition into emerging laws and requirements, the landscape shifts. Investors and regulators no longer want marketing campaigns. They want accurate data provided with assurance. This brings us to a harsh reality I share with teams newly subject to these regulations: If you are required to file a report in 2027 based on 2026 data, and you wait until 2026 to start preparing, you are already late. Leaders often assume their existing accounting systems are naturally ready to handle ESG reporting. They almost never are. The Illusion of Alignment I see leadership teams fall into this trap constantly. They look at their organizational chart, see a separate Finance team and a separate ESG team, and assume they are covered. But in practice, these two teams are working in silos, speaking entirely different languages. I see this pattern constantly with companies that have been publishing ESG reports voluntarily for a number of years. As they prepare for mandated regulatory reporting, leadership feels secure because their ESG team is getting the exact reports they requested from Finance. But the moment you dig into the architecture and bridge the two teams, the gaps become obvious. Here is how the breakdown usually happens: The Ask: The ESG team needs data to calculate emissions, so they ask Finance for certain reports. The Hand-off: Finance, wanting to be helpful, pulls the data and hands it over. The Gap: Finance teams are wired to be compliant with accounting standards, but they aren’t trained to understand ESG reporting. ESG teams are great at translating finance data into emissions, but they don’t have the concept of an audit. Because the ESG team didn’t have an audit background, they didn’t know how to establish completeness and accuracy. They didn’t know how to look for certain accounting transactions that would otherwise be considered emission or non-emissive (i.e., advance or duplicate payments, reversed entries in the vendor reports). They were running calculations on raw data. The people didn’t fail: the structure simply wasn’t built to translate between the two departments. The Reality of Retroactive Cleanup The true operational complexity of ESG reporting reveals itself when you try to force accounting data into sustainability buckets. Take something as standard as a growing portfolio of leased facilities. From a purely financial perspective, a company might have these perfectly recorded. But you cannot translate that 1:1 to ESG data. For ESG, you have to review the business structure to see who actually holds ‘operational control’ so you can assign those facilities to the proper emissions categories.. When a company’s data architecture isn’t set up for this level of granularity, teams are forced to go back and manually revisit hundreds of outstanding contracts. What should take a minute to encode upfront easily turns into a multi-month project just to find the proper data sources. When you wait to build the system, you force your teams to look backward instead of forward. What You Need to Check Today The fix is actively bridging the technical gap. You need professionals who can translate complex sustainability metrics into an accounting standard, and vice versa. If you are a CFO or sustainability leader reading this today, before making your next public ESG commitment, take a hard look at your architecture. Ask yourself these three questions: Are my on-book activities scoped properly? Check if all financial transactions have been mapped to the appropriate ESG requirement. Are my off-book activities accounted for? Ensure your people management, technology, and operational data are fully captured. Are all stakeholders involved? If ESG reporting is falling entirely on your Finance team, or solely on your ESG team without Finance’s oversight, you have a translation gap. Operations, HR, and Tech must understand the why and the how of the data they are providing. A calm, predictable reporting cycle is designed, never improvised. Build the data architecture a year or two before the regulations hit, and ensure your financial execution naturally supports confident sustainability reporting.

Read More >

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.