Why Internal Controls are a Must for Small Businesses

Scrubbed

Scrubbed

Why Internal Controls are a Must for Small Businesses
If you own or manage a small business, especially a start-up venture, it’s essential to have all your financial ducks in a row. You’ve probably gone to the trouble of setting up a budget and a timeline for business expansion. You may have targeted certain dates in the future to launch products or to go after further venture capital or loans. As you scale, transactions will trigger changes in your business environment. While change is good, the danger of going out there is on not keeping up with the changes.  Sometimes, the pain of not keeping up may result in financial losses. Internal controls put a halt to an uncontrolled faucet—it saves you resources, and most importantly, it refocuses your view on the things that matter.

Therefore, one of the most important tasks you should take care of early on in the establishment of your business is the implementation of internal controls.

Internal controls are policies and procedures designed to help you protect your assets, meet financial documentation requirements, and operate within compliance. Here is an introduction to internal controls and why they are a must for your small company, and the concept is not limited alone to listed companies. And here’s a nice bonus if you’re the business founder and CEO: you’ll get to take some tasks off your plate and free up your time to be the leader you’ve always dreamed of being.

SPREAD THE WORK BURDEN

As the CEO and/or founder of a small business, you may find yourself wearing a lot of hats–too many hats most likely. It’s hard enough to get everything on your to-do list accomplished and even harder to do it to your high standards when you are constantly pressed for time. If you’re running payroll, balancing the checkbook, paying invoices, sending out bills, and conducting audits, you’re doing way too much in the financial sector of your company.

Internal controls naturally help share the workload because an implicit tenet of internal control is the segregation of duties. Just like in many governments, separating tasks creates checks and balances and takes the pressure off the company’s leader and select top management.

An example of segregating duties is having a different person reconcile your books than the one who is doing the spending. Another check is to require a second party to authorize spending over a certain threshold to ensure one person doesn’t get carried away with the checkbook. This way, you can have comfort that without micro-managing, all employees are oriented towards a control-conscious atmosphere, and delegation of authority becomes effective.

MAKE POLICIES CLEAR

Another natural result of initiating internal controls is that it forces businesses to write down their accounting and spending policies. When you take the time to do this, you can be more thoughtful about your finances. You can set spending limits, create a budget, and develop rules for documenting transactions.

Having written policies can be helpful in multiple situations. For example, you may have an employee who does something unscrupulous that warrants reprimand or even dismissal. If you have clear-cut policies in place, there’s no question when someone violates them, and you can make enforcing the consequences unquestionable. You may even stave off a wrongful termination lawsuit.

Furthermore, internal controls that are written down make it far easier to on-board new employees whose tasks may involve spending money, payroll, and the like. At some point, you will probably grow, and these early internal controls can be adapted for a new employee handbook to help train staff. You can even use some of these controls in employee performance and compensation reviews. The best part of it is that if you start head-on, your people are geared towards easily complying with internal control policies—something that emerging companies consider difficult achieving.

PROVIDE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION

Another way written policies can assist you is when you need documentation of your financial policies and budget, for whatever reason. Perhaps you need to undergo an audit, hire a tax professional, or apply for venture capital funding. In many instances, sloppy or missing record-keeping can hurt your business and result in penalties or a lost infusion of cash. Items you want to make sure to document include:
  • Cash and banking transactions
  • Accounts payable and receivable
  • Spending budget
  • Payroll
  • Statements as required by law (taxes, nonprofit audits, etc.)

If you have gone a while with poor documentation, don’t despair. You can start where you are and make sure that moving forward, you’re providing better documentation. Once you get caught up, you can go back and reconstruct older records if needed. But don’t let a lack of documentation up until this point keep you from maintaining proper records in the future. Accurate information fixates your eyes to seeing what the real deal is, and not just some clutter of unnecessary data.
One thing many new small business owners forget to do is to create multiple sources of liquidity. Let’s say you have a sudden opportunity to do something or a need for emergency cash. You want to have several sources from which you can draw on the funds. When you set up internal controls, you’re more likely to think about scenarios like that.

PREVENT FRAUD

You may not be aware that small businesses have the highest percentage of fraud and the highest median loss of all business types. You may not want to even imagine it, but sadly, there are employees–even coworkers in the upper management tier–who embezzle and otherwise commit fraudulent financial acts. This includes employees who engage in corruption by using their influence in the business for their own monetary betterment.

When you set up internal controls for your business’s finances, you reduce the risk of fraud with the aforementioned checks and balances. In developing your policies and procedures, be sure to include protections like limiting data and password access and setting up fail-safes for vital financial roles and tasks. A simple example is to require two signatures on every check over a set amount. Other ways to prevent fraud with internal controls include:
  • Conduct background checks and get references for prospecting employees.
  • Separate business and personal finances.
  • Check bank statements against business ledgers.
  • Track sales and other revenue sources.
  • Match outgoing expenses to invoices to avoid duplicate or overpayment.
  • Have a second person review payroll before it is distributed.
  • Minimize the use of credit cards.
  • Make sure employees are conducting financial transactions on work computers or devices.
  • Develop a strict bring-your-own-device program for the sharing of work data on non-company devices, including emails.
  • Mandate vacations to spot anything suspicious while employees are out of the office.
  • Use two parties or more when filing any insurance claims.
  • Conduct physical audits of inventory and cash on hand.
  • Calculate daily or weekly trial balances in between larger audits.
  • Use common sense if an employee seems to be living far beyond their means without any rational explanation (spouse’s income, inheritance, etc.).
  • Hire a knowledgeable board of directors who can help oversee the above and advise you on detailed elements of your internal controls.

IMPROVE YOUR BUSINESS TERMINOLOGY

Setting up internal controls for your company’s finances will help you get better at understanding business terminology you might have otherwise ignored. You’ll come across as more professional and experienced when it comes to the financial aspects of your startup when you understand terms like:
  • Audit evidence
  • Control risk
  • Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
  • Sampling

If all of the above sounds completely overwhelming and beyond the scope of your business, consider outsourcing your accounting and/or CFO roles to a professional team. Many successful small businesses do this because it accomplishes so much of the intention behind internal controls:
  • Segregation of tasks
  • Work burden-sharing
  • Fraud reduction
  • Proper documentation
  • Better evaluation and forecasting

Do you want to scale your business? You cannot do that if you keep wearing all the hats, particularly in the financial department. You will never have the time you need to play with your creative instincts, pursue investors, or examine staffing needs. Be realistic–can you actually launch a new line of services while working 20 hours a week as your company’s ersatz accountant*?
Scrubbed can take on many of your small business’s financial tasks and function in the role of CFO or accountant* without you having to hire anyone. We can provide outsourced CFO services for a few months, a year, or more–however long it takes until you are ready for your own in-house employee.
With turnkey business services that address virtually all of the concerns raised above, Scrubbed can help with:
  • accounting and financial reporting
  • Inventory management support
  • White label accounting
  • Audit and professional services
  • Tax preparation and filing
  • Corporate finance services

Scrubbed also specializes in SaaS accounting expertise, supporting start-ups and growing companies with unique financial reporting needs, compliance requirements, and scalable internal controls.
Scrubbed can also help you picture where you are at in terms of your controls consciousness and risk appetite, with the following:
  • Risk assessment and consultation
  • Gap analysis
  • Internal controls testing
  • Internal audit support

Contact Scrubbed today for a free consultation to see how your small business could implement the internal controls it needs by making use of our menu of services. Whether you’re looking to strengthen financial oversight or improve strategic planning, our fractional CFO services can provide the expert guidance you need. We can help you stay on track to reach the goals that led you to open your business in the first place, and you’ll sleep better knowing you’re meeting requirements, setting checks and balances, and protecting the business assets you worked so hard to obtain.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Matt has been heavily involved in integrated audits with Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting, risk consulting, and internal audit support. He supports clients’ risk assessment process, evaluation of internal control, and provides control rationalization. His expertise also includes assurance and financial reporting advisory engagements. He champions millennial leadership and advocates controls consciousness of start-ups as requisite activity towards scaling.

Related Content

Blogs

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

September 15 Estimated Tax Deadline: Strategies for Pass-Through Entities

For growing pass-through entities, the September 15 tax deadline often creates a collision between cash flow and internal capacity. Guessing at estimated payments leaves companies vulnerable to IRS penalties or unnecessarily traps critical working capital meant for Q4 growth. By establishing a Safe Harbor floor and utilizing the Annualized Income Installment Method, companies can align tax outlays directly with actual revenue. When this execution is handled proactively, finance leaders stop playing defense against deadlines and reclaim their time for strategic planning. When a high-growth pass-through entity, such as an S-Corp or a Partnership, comes off an unexpectedly strong summer, revenue is up. This should be a moment for leadership to celebrate and plan their Q4 investments. Instead, the internal finance team often finds themselves staring down a cash crunch they didn't anticipate. The pressure point is September 15. For growing operations, this date is often a collision course. It is not only the deadline for Q3 estimated tax payments, but it is also the extended filing deadline for Forms 1065 and 1120-S . When you have an internal team trying to finalize the previous year's historical data while simultaneously projecting the current year's performance, the structure usually begins to strain. This isn't about a team dropping the ball. It's simply what happens when internal workflows haven't scaled up to match a company's growth. When two major deadlines collide, and the volume is too high, a stretched team has no choice but to improvise. The Cost of "Guesstimating" In a pass-through entity, the business itself generally does not pay federal income tax. Because income from partnerships and S corporations generally passes through to their owners, owners may need to make individual estimated tax payments based in part on their share of the entity’s taxable income When internal teams don't have a dedicated workflow for this, they often get bogged down trying to predict exact year-end profits during a busy quarter. Without a clear mechanism to manage this, I frequently see companies do one of two things: they either underpay and leave themselves vulnerable to IRS penalties, or they overpay to "be safe." Overpaying might feel like the responsible choice in the moment, but it unnecessarily ties up working capital. When these distributions are sized off gross revenue rather than a projection that accounts for deductions or state-level elections, the company pulls more cash out of the operating account than the owners actually owe. That excess traps liquidity that could have been used to fund critical Q4 growth initiatives—like a marketing push or inventory expansion—without seeking outside financing. Establishing an Estimated-Tax Safe Harbor  When our tax professionals step in to manage this process, the very first thing we do is establish a predictable foundation. We immediately build a "Tax Compliance Calendar" integrated with a "Safe Harbor Floor." A useful starting point is determining which estimated-tax safe harbor applies. For many taxpayers, one option is to base required annual payments on 100% of the prior year's tax, increasing to 110% for certain higher-income taxpayers. The current-year 90% test may also apply. Meeting the applicable requirements through timely payments can generally reduce exposure to estimated-tax underpayment penalties. Once that floor is established, we can adjust for the reality of the current year. Aligning Outlays with Actual Cash Flow If a company sees a massive spike in revenue during Q3, the standard installment method might demand a payment that creates a sudden cash flow imbalance. Good intentions won't balance the cash flow at this stage; you need a precise mathematical approach. To stabilize cash flow during a sudden revenue surge, one strategy to consider is the Annualized Income Installment Method . Instead of assuming income is earned evenly throughout the year, the Annualized Income Installment Method determines the owner's required installments based more closely on income earned during the applicable annualization periods State-level PTE tax elections may also provide federal tax benefits by allowing qualifying state income taxes to be paid and deducted at the entity level rather than being subject to the individual SALT deduction limitation. The result? Depending on the state's PTE tax regime, entity-level payments may reduce the state estimated-tax payments otherwise required from individual owners. A deductible PTE tax payment may also reduce the taxable income passed through to owners for federal purposes, which can affect their projected federal estimated-tax liability. Restoring Strategic Headspace When tax planning is handled consistently throughout the year, it changes how a leadership team operates. It can significantly reduce the risk of an "April Surprise." When Q3 estimates are calculated accurately and tied to a deliberate strategy, leadership knows exactly how much capital is truly theirs to spend. Tax shifts from a looming, unpredictable liability into a manageable line item. Just as importantly, the internal finance leader gets their time back. Instead of spending the first two weeks of September finalizing and issuing K-1s, calculating thresholds, and worrying about penalties, they can focus on high-level financial modeling and operational efficiency. A strong tax partner doesn't just run the numbers; they take the friction out of the process so your team can focus forward. When an experienced team handles the heavy lifting behind the scenes, you stop playing defense against IRS deadlines and start using tax strategy as a genuine tool to fund your growth. See how our tax professionals support growing operations and keep execution predictable. Let's talk through how we can support your finance function. Comparing Q3 Tax Strategies: Safe Harbor vs. Annualized Method vs. PTE Strategy Ideal for Primary Benefit Risk Level  100%/110% Safe Harbor  Rapidly growing companies  Provides protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied  Low (May temporarily tie up cash if revenue drops)  Annualized Method  Seasonal or late-year spiking revenue Align tax outlays directly with timing of taxable income  Moderate (Requires meticulous record-keeping) PTE Tax Election Entities in high-tax states May provide an entity-level federal deduction for qualifying state income taxes while providing state tax benefits to eligible owners Low (Requires state-specific eligibility and election compliance) Key Takeaways: The Deadline Collision: The simultaneous timing of Q3 estimates and extended historical filings places severe strain on internal finance teams when workflows haven't scaled. The Cost of "Guesstimating": Overpaying estimated taxes based on gross revenue ties up liquidity that could otherwise fund critical Q4 growth initiatives without requiring outside financing. Building a Safe Harbor Floor: Establishing a baseline payment based on 100% or 110% of the prior year's tax liability can provide protection from estimated-tax underpayment penalties when the applicable safe-harbor requirements are satisfied. Aligning Cash Flow: The Annualized Income Installment Method stabilizes cash positions by calculating tax based on income earned during the applicable annualization periods rather than an arbitrary quarterly fraction. Restoring Strategic Headspace: When tax planning is handled reliably behind the scenes, internal finance leaders get their time back to focus on high-level financial modeling instead of chasing K-1s.

Read More >
Blogs

Decoding the Digital Ledger: Navigating FASB’s New Standards for Crypto Assets and Intangibles (ASU 2023-08)

Decoding the Digital Ledger: Navigating FASB’s New Standards for Crypto Assets and Intangibles (ASU 2023-08)

In a groundbreaking move reflecting the swift evolution of the financial landscape, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has taken a significant step with the release of the final Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-08 titled “Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets.” This authoritative guidance specifically addresses Crypto Assets within the Intangibles—Goodwill and Other category, marking a crucial advance in establishing standardized accounting practices for these assets. Bridging the Gap: A Brief Background The rise of digital assets, from cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum to unique non-fungible tokens (NFTs), has challenged traditional accounting norms. Without specific Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) guidance, accounting professionals relied on analogies and interpretations, resulting in a diverse patchwork of practices.  Our article “Rise of Digital Assets in Business” explored the evolving landscape, highlighting the AICPA Practice Aid titled “Accounting for and Auditing of Digital Assets” as a crucial guide within the constraints of the existing accounting framework. We are witnessing a groundbreaking shift with the finalized FASB’s ASU on Crypto Assets, effective December 15, 2024, which will change how the world sees crypto assets. Who Will Be Affected? The new ASU applies to a wider range of entities than you might think. Any entity holding crypto assets that meet specific criteria will be impacted. These criteria include: Meet the definition of an intangible asset. Do not grant enforceable rights or claims on underlying goods, services, or assets. Exist on a blockchain-based distributed ledger or similar technology. Are secured using cryptography. Are fungible. Are not created or issued by the reporting entity or its related parties. Crypto assets falling within these criteria must be measured at fair value, with changes in value recognized in their income statement each reporting period. Moreover, transaction costs incurred in acquiring these assets, such as commissions and related fees, will be expensed unless other industry-specific guidance dictates otherwise. A Closer Look at the New ASU  Mandating Relevance: Fair Value Measurement  The update mandates the fair value measurement of crypto assets at each reporting period. This focus on fair value measurement stems from the belief that fair value offers investors more relevant information about the assets’ sale value and changes in that value. The Board rejected historical cost and net realizable value as alternatives due to limitations in reflecting downward and upward price movements. The existing guidance in Topic 820 was deemed sufficient for fair value measurement, given its applicability to other assets and current use by reporting entities. As financial reporting evolves, organizations offering ESG reporting services may also need to consider how such valuation updates intersect with broader transparency and sustainability disclosure requirements. Beyond Annual Assessment: Recognizing Both Gains and Losses Unlike the existing ASC 350 model, which mandates an annual assessment of crypto asset value that only recognizes gains upon sale, the update embraces a more dynamic approach. The new method captures both negative and positive market movements, addressing longstanding concerns about the traditional model’s failure to reflect the true and current economic nature of crypto assets at each reporting period. As well as providing a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying economics and an entity’s financial position, the shift signifies a progressive step toward a more responsive and accurate representation of the financial impact of market fluctuations on digital holdings. Enhancing Transparency: Disclosure Requirements The ASU prioritizes transparency, incorporating detailed disclosure requirements for asset categorization, impairment considerations, and, notably, the separate presentation of crypto assets from other intangible assets in the statement of financial position. Entities must disclose the following for annual and interim reporting periods: 1. Details of significant and less significant crypto asset holdings, including name, cost basis, fair value, and quantity. 2. Information on restricted crypto assets, covering fair value, nature, the remaining duration of restrictions, and circumstances for the potential lapse. For annual reporting periods, additional disclosures are required: 1. A roll forward of crypto asset activity, including additions, dispositions, gains, and losses. Specify the income statement line item for unrecognized gains and losses if not presented separately. 2. Detail dispositions of crypto assets, including sale price, cost basis difference, and relevant activities. 3. The method used to determine the cost basis of crypto assets. These changes enhance transparency and understanding of crypto asset holdings, ensuring comprehensive disclosure for annual and interim reporting periods. Nevertheless, entities immediately converting crypto assets received as noncash consideration or contributions into cash are exempt from the above annual additional disclosures. The Countdown Begins: Timeline and Adoption The final standard takes effect for all entities in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2024, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, allowing entities to embrace the changes ahead of the mandated timeline. However, early adopters must use a modified retrospective approach, requiring recording a cumulative effect adjustment to equity (or net assets) from the commencement of the adoption year. What Lies Ahead: Implications for the Future The issuance of the finalized ASU 2023-08 represents a proactive response to the growing significance of crypto assets in today’s financial landscape. The finalized ASU is a significant milestone in our journey toward a standardized and transparent future for crypto asset accounting, offering consistency in financial reporting across diverse industries engaged with crypto assets. The FASB’s move acknowledges the need for accounting standards that keep pace with technological advancements and reflect the realities of the modern economy. Stay tuned for further developments. How Scrubbed Can Help You? Navigating the opportunities and challenges of crypto assets demands expertise, whether you’re an individual investor or a business. At Scrubbed, our comprehensive range of services empowers you to stay ahead: • Compliance Experts: Navigate crypto regulations effortlessly with our seasoned professionals. From taxes to reporting, we’ve got your compliance needs covered. • Rock-Solid Controls: Establish secure systems and ensure compliance with the latest financial reporting standards like GAAP and IFRS. • Innovative Strategies: Beyond the numbers, we offer strategic insights about market tren ds and help you make wise decisions. As we collectively pioneer a new era of financial reporting, Scrubbed is committed to bridging the gap between traditional accounting norms and the groundbreaking shifts introduced by the FASB on Crypto Assets. Our Technical Accounting Group is ready to assist your business in decoding the digital ledger, ensuring effective operations, and maintaining compliance with evolving regulations. We also provide specialized biotech accounting services, supporting organizations in highly regulated industries with tailored financial reporting solutions. For a comprehensive consultancy assessment tailored to your specific needs, reach out to [email protected].

Read More >
Blogs

The ESG Translation Gap: Why Good Accounting Data Fails Sustainability Audits

The ESG Translation Gap: Why Good Accounting Data Fails Sustainability Audits

If I had to name the first common mistake I see growing companies make when they tackle ESG reporting, it is foundational: They don’t know if the data they are using is complete and accurate. More than that, they often don’t even know if it is the data they should be using. For years, ESG reporting was largely voluntary, a way to answer the public’s demand for accountability and show investors you were responsible. But as optional guidelines transition into emerging laws and requirements, the landscape shifts. Investors and regulators no longer want marketing campaigns. They want accurate data provided with assurance. This brings us to a harsh reality I share with teams newly subject to these regulations: If you are required to file a report in 2027 based on 2026 data, and you wait until 2026 to start preparing, you are already late. Leaders often assume their existing accounting systems are naturally ready to handle ESG reporting. They almost never are. The Illusion of Alignment I see leadership teams fall into this trap constantly. They look at their organizational chart, see a separate Finance team and a separate ESG team, and assume they are covered. But in practice, these two teams are working in silos, speaking entirely different languages. I see this pattern constantly with companies that have been publishing ESG reports voluntarily for a number of years. As they prepare for mandated regulatory reporting, leadership feels secure because their ESG team is getting the exact reports they requested from Finance. But the moment you dig into the architecture and bridge the two teams, the gaps become obvious. Here is how the breakdown usually happens: The Ask: The ESG team needs data to calculate emissions, so they ask Finance for certain reports. The Hand-off: Finance, wanting to be helpful, pulls the data and hands it over. The Gap: Finance teams are wired to be compliant with accounting standards, but they aren’t trained to understand ESG reporting. ESG teams are great at translating finance data into emissions, but they don’t have the concept of an audit. Because the ESG team didn’t have an audit background, they didn’t know how to establish completeness and accuracy. They didn’t know how to look for certain accounting transactions that would otherwise be considered emission or non-emissive (i.e., advance or duplicate payments, reversed entries in the vendor reports). They were running calculations on raw data. The people didn’t fail: the structure simply wasn’t built to translate between the two departments. The Reality of Retroactive Cleanup The true operational complexity of ESG reporting reveals itself when you try to force accounting data into sustainability buckets. Take something as standard as a growing portfolio of leased facilities. From a purely financial perspective, a company might have these perfectly recorded. But you cannot translate that 1:1 to ESG data. For ESG, you have to review the business structure to see who actually holds ‘operational control’ so you can assign those facilities to the proper emissions categories.. When a company’s data architecture isn’t set up for this level of granularity, teams are forced to go back and manually revisit hundreds of outstanding contracts. What should take a minute to encode upfront easily turns into a multi-month project just to find the proper data sources. When you wait to build the system, you force your teams to look backward instead of forward. What You Need to Check Today The fix is actively bridging the technical gap. You need professionals who can translate complex sustainability metrics into an accounting standard, and vice versa. If you are a CFO or sustainability leader reading this today, before making your next public ESG commitment, take a hard look at your architecture. Ask yourself these three questions: Are my on-book activities scoped properly? Check if all financial transactions have been mapped to the appropriate ESG requirement. Are my off-book activities accounted for? Ensure your people management, technology, and operational data are fully captured. Are all stakeholders involved? If ESG reporting is falling entirely on your Finance team, or solely on your ESG team without Finance’s oversight, you have a translation gap. Operations, HR, and Tech must understand the why and the how of the data they are providing. A calm, predictable reporting cycle is designed, never improvised. Build the data architecture a year or two before the regulations hit, and ensure your financial execution naturally supports confident sustainability reporting.

Read More >

Contact Information

SF Bay Area Headquarters
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 320, Burlingame, CA 94010, United States

Phone: (800)837-5160
Email: [email protected]

"Scrubbed" is the brand name under which Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP provide professional services. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC and Scrubbed Assurance, LLP practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations, and professional standards. Scrubbed Assurance, LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Scrubbed Advisory, LLC provides tax, finance, and support services to its clients. Scrubbed Advisory, LLC is not a licensed CPA firm.

Copyright © Scrubbed. All rights reserved.